biztalk

问题 I am new to BizTalk development. I am using BizTalk server 2010. I am doing a migration existing code which use BizTalk 2006 to 2010. In the old application we have used Sql adapter to get procedure out put for a xml file. MSDN for the 2010 specifies that BizTalk Server no longer supports the SQL Adapter. Consider using the Microsoft BizTalk Adapter Pack to achieve the same functionality. (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa578608.aspx) But when I install BizTalk 2010 it has the SQL

问题 I'm new to Biztalk. I wish to structure my artifacts into applications. Should I go with one application per artifact type - for example 3 seperate applications, like 'BusinessProcess.Schemas', 'BusinessProcess.Maps', 'BusinessProcess.Maps', with all the assemblies related to these (typically just one), or do you think it best to just have one 'BusinessProcess' application, which would contain all assemblies related to the business process? 回答1: Should I go with one application per artifact

问题 I have flat file schema (description below), I am getting flat file(description below) through custom pipeline, the flat file fails disassemble phase with the following error: Unexpected end of stream while looking for: '\r\n' The current definition being parsed is Root. The stream offset where the error occurred is 202. The line number where the error occurred is 5. The column where the error occurred is 0. HRESULT: 80131940 I tried various options (child order, child delimiter etc.) but all

问题 Closed . This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post. Closed 4 years ago . Has anyone used log4net with Biztalk? We are currently looking into using it and are trying to access pros/cons, and whether or not it would meet our needs. 回答1: I have used Log4Net with BizTalk, but i will say that out of the box i ran into issues. Every call out of BizTalk

问题 Can someone help me with this? I have a biztalk mapping. In the source scheme there are two address records with address elements. Address record 1 always exists in the source scheme, but if address record 2 exists in the source I would like to map that to the destination instead of address record 1. Is that possible to do? 回答1: These are the steps I would take to achieve this - it'll have to be a high level description of a solution as you haven't included any schema definition or Xml sample

问题 Sometimes we use global variables in our Biztalk configuration ( BTSNTSvc.exe.config ), we add these with the following code: <appSettings> <!--<add key="ZNA_Integratie_Prestaties_OasisProxy_OasisServiceProxy_Service" value="http://localhost/service.asmx" />--> <add key="IPSdatum" value="20090101" /> </appSettings> Using the following c# code we can read in the value: ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["IPSdatum"] Now normally we when we add a webreference to our biztalk projects we use them

问题 While chasing incremental build time improvements, I found that .btproj files and thus all other projects that depend on these are rebuilt (partly) on each incremental build. Tracking this all the way to BizTalkCommon.targets, I found that it does a 2 pass compilation of the assembly - but only the first pass respects already built artifacts, thus breaking the incremental part of the dependency chain. The offending target can be seen in BizTalkCommon.targets (line 228): <!-- Delete the

问题 I have a terrible piece of XML that I need to process through BizTalk, and I have managed to normalise it into this example below. I am no XSLT ninja, but between the web and the VS2010 debugger, I can find my way around XSL. I now need a clever bit of XSLT to "weed out" the duplicate elements and only keep the latest ones, as decided by the date in the ValidFromDate attribute. The ValidFromDate attribute is of the XSD:Date type. <SomeData> <A ValidFromDate="2011-12-01">A_1</A> <A

问题 Is BizTalk Server 2013 compatible with the Dynamics AX 2009 AIF BizTalk Adapter? I've searched but can't find any information to say either way. I found that BizTalk Server 2010 is compatible with AX2009 SP1 RU7: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/emeadaxsupport/archive/2011/09/29/microsoft-biztalk-server-2010-passes-compatibility-testing-with-microsoft-dynamics-ax-2009-sp1.aspx (Apologies if this is not the correct site for this question, as it's not directly programming related; however I couldn't

问题 I'm reading all over the net that you your separate your "external schemas" from your "internal schemas" and never expose the "internal schemas" to any external actor. If my solution only acts as a messagebus to create a loose coupling between 2 existing systems, will I really need any internal schemas? System A makes a Request(Message with SchemaA) to Biztalk Biztalk Maps SchemaA to SchemaB Biztalk forwards request of type SchemaB to SystemB SystemB returns ResponseB Biztalk maps ResponeB to