biztalk-2009

I need my BizTalk map to stop converting xml:lang to ns1:lang

白昼怎懂夜的黑 提交于 2019-12-11 18:04:28
问题 I have a map in BizTalk 2009 that is converting some data into an XML document to be sent on to another system. The target schema includes some elements with xml:lang attributes. BizTalk generates those as ns1:lang . The target system requires that the prefix xml be used. Here is a simplified example to show what BizTalk is doing: sample.xsd <xs:schema targetNamespace="http://example.com/" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"> <xs:import schemaLocation="common.xsd" namespace="http:/

How to Resolve a Transformation Service with BRE that occurs after an Orchestration in an Itinerary?

淺唱寂寞╮ 提交于 2019-12-11 09:45:22
问题 In trying to implement simple integration patterns with Biztalk ESB Toolkit 2.0, I'm facing a problem trying to resolve a Transformation Itinerary Service that occurs after an Orchestration. I'm using the BRE Resolver to execute rules that need to inspect the Context Message Type property to determine the appropriate map to use. However, once the message reaches the step in the Itinerary associated with the Transformation Service, the map fails to execute. From careful investigation, it

Biztalk - SOAP response contains multiref so it can't be processed

岁酱吖の 提交于 2019-12-11 07:11:37
问题 I consume a WCF service in Biztalk with the wizard "Add generated Items -> Consume WCF Service " The problem I have is the service is returning a response that can't be parsed: Reason: An error occurred when parsing the incoming document: "There are multiple root elements. Line 1, position 296." That's surprising since I'm using the autogenerated schemas But is not an Error message since the service makes the expected operation, the problem I think has to do with the multiRef tag Response:

Incremental build support in Biztalk 2009 and 2010 .btproj projects?

依然范特西╮ 提交于 2019-12-10 14:02:40
问题 While chasing incremental build time improvements, I found that .btproj files and thus all other projects that depend on these are rebuilt (partly) on each incremental build. Tracking this all the way to BizTalkCommon.targets, I found that it does a 2 pass compilation of the assembly - but only the first pass respects already built artifacts, thus breaking the incremental part of the dependency chain. The offending target can be seen in BizTalkCommon.targets (line 228): <!-- Delete the

In BizTalk why is an MSI file both imported and installed?

故事扮演 提交于 2019-12-08 23:45:18
问题 I'm working on a BizTalk project and don't understand the reason for both installing (double-clicking) and importing (using biztalk admin console) is needed. I have a BizTalk project and I added bindings to it's resources and exported an msi file. Now I want to install the application on another server. As far as I can tell this is what an MSI install does: Copies files to the file system Registers assemblies into the GAC Adds the Application to the Add/Remove programs applet However, here

BizTalk WCF-SQL Adapter Selecting from a view

余生长醉 提交于 2019-12-08 05:13:48
问题 I have the most annoying issue; I have an orchestration doing a lookup against a view. it works in locally and on our development server, but not in QA or UAT. same code. same views. just different environments. To test this and be sure it's not a coding issue I take my local BizTalk, configure the port to Server A, fire a message and it works as expected. I then change the configuration of the send port to Server B (that's all I change) and fire the same message in, and it fails. I get one

BizTalk WCF-SQL Adapter Selecting from a view

|▌冷眼眸甩不掉的悲伤 提交于 2019-12-07 00:52:26
I have the most annoying issue; I have an orchestration doing a lookup against a view. it works in locally and on our development server, but not in QA or UAT. same code. same views. just different environments. To test this and be sure it's not a coding issue I take my local BizTalk, configure the port to Server A, fire a message and it works as expected. I then change the configuration of the send port to Server B (that's all I change) and fire the same message in, and it fails. I get one of two errors for the same operation for the SAME view, so not even the error message is consistent.

BizTalk 2009 ESB Confusion

半腔热情 提交于 2019-12-06 02:35:49
问题 I have a little experience with BizTalk and am trying to understand BizTalk 2009 ESB Toolkit 2 without using it. Firstly, I am wondering whether anyone can clear up a couple of concepts for me: What is the difference between an "on-ramp" and a "receive port"? Why do you need itineraries, can you not simply create the same using ports and orchestrations? I am obviously missing something here. A couple of more general questions: Do all messages still have to go through the Message Box? Thanks

BizTalk 2009 ESB Confusion

做~自己de王妃 提交于 2019-12-04 08:42:47
I have a little experience with BizTalk and am trying to understand BizTalk 2009 ESB Toolkit 2 without using it. Firstly, I am wondering whether anyone can clear up a couple of concepts for me: What is the difference between an "on-ramp" and a "receive port"? Why do you need itineraries, can you not simply create the same using ports and orchestrations? I am obviously missing something here. A couple of more general questions: Do all messages still have to go through the Message Box? Thanks in advance for any insight. On-ramps The on-ramps are web service based receive port but they are a bit