atexit

Error with multiprocessing, atexit and global data

Deadly 提交于 2019-12-07 06:15:28
问题 Sorry in advance, this is going to be long ... Possibly related: Python Multiprocessing atexit Error "Error in atexit._run_exitfuncs" Definitely related: python parallel map (multiprocessing.Pool.map) with global data Keyboard Interrupts with python's multiprocessing Pool Here's a "simple" script I hacked together to illustrate my problem... import time import multiprocessing as multi import atexit cleanup_stuff=multi.Manager().list([]) ################################################## #

killing child processes at parent process exit

情到浓时终转凉″ 提交于 2019-12-06 10:41:33
I'm very new to c and programming and need some help. In c on linux(cygwin) I am required to remove all child processes at exit. I have looked at the other similar questions but can't get it to work. I've tried- atexit(killzombies); //in parent process void killzombies(void) { printf("works"); kill(0, SIGTERM); printf("works"); if (waitpid(-1, SIGCHLD, WNOHANG) < 0) printf("works"); } for some reason, "works" doesn't even print ever. I press ctrl + c to exit. ALSO I have tried- prctl(PR_SET_PDEATHSIG, SIGHUP); //in child process signal(SIGHUP, killMe); void killMe() { printf("works"); exit(1);

atexit considered harmful?

江枫思渺然 提交于 2019-12-06 08:02:13
问题 Are there inherent dangers in using atexit in large projects such as libraries? If so, what is it about the technical nature behind atexit that may lead to problems in larger projects? 回答1: The main reason I would avoid using atexit in libraries is that any use of it involves global state. A good library should avoid having global state. However, there are also other technical reasons: Implementations are only required to support a small number (32, I think) of atexit handlers. After that, it

What is the difference between __cxa_atexit() and atexit()

给你一囗甜甜゛ 提交于 2019-12-06 02:28:10
问题 In the GCC docs I found the -fuse-cxa-atexit option and it says the following: This option is required for fully standards-compliant handling of static destructors So what is the difference between the two? In the docs for __cxa_atexit I found the following: The __cxa_atexit() function is used to implement atexit() I'm implementing statics in functions (don't ask why) and I was wondering which of the 2 to use for calling the destructor. And I guess I only have atexit() for MSVC? Is that a

Better replacement for exit(), atexit() in C

瘦欲@ 提交于 2019-12-05 22:27:01
问题 I am new to C programming. I used to think using exit() was the cleanest way of process termination (as it is capable of removing temporary files, closing open files, normal process termination...), but when I tried man exit command on the terminal (Ubuntu 16.04.5, gcc 5.4.0) I saw the following line: The exit() function uses a global variable that is not protected, so it is not thread-safe. After that I tried to make some research about better replacement for exit() (to change my programming

Error with multiprocessing, atexit and global data

余生长醉 提交于 2019-12-05 13:00:56
Sorry in advance, this is going to be long ... Possibly related: Python Multiprocessing atexit Error "Error in atexit._run_exitfuncs" Definitely related: python parallel map (multiprocessing.Pool.map) with global data Keyboard Interrupts with python's multiprocessing Pool Here's a "simple" script I hacked together to illustrate my problem... import time import multiprocessing as multi import atexit cleanup_stuff=multi.Manager().list([]) ################################################## # Some code to allow keyboard interrupts ################################################## was_interrupted

ruby at_exit exit status

自古美人都是妖i 提交于 2019-12-04 17:16:23
问题 Can i determine selves process exit status in at_exit block? at_exit do if this_process_status.success? print 'Success' else print 'Failure' end end 回答1: Although the documentation on this is really thin, $! is set to be the last exception that occurs, and after an exit() call this is a SystemExit exception. Putting those two together you get this: at_exit do if ($!.success?) print 'Success' else print 'Failure' end end 回答2: using idea from tadman at_exit do if $!.nil? || $!.is_a?(SystemExit)

python 2.6.x theading / signals /atexit fail on some versions?

偶尔善良 提交于 2019-12-04 12:26:23
问题 I've seen a lot of questions related to this... but my code works on python 2.6.2 and fails to work on python 2.6.5. Am I wrong in thinking that the whole atexit "functions registered via this module are not called when the program is killed by a signal" thing shouldn't count here because I'm catching the signal and then exiting cleanly? What's going on here? Whats the proper way to do this? import atexit, sys, signal, time, threading terminate = False threads = [] def test_loop(): while True

Run atexit() when python process is killed

泪湿孤枕 提交于 2019-12-04 06:09:08
I have a python process which runs in background, and I would like it to generate some output only when the script is terminated. def handle_exit(): print('\nAll files saved in ' + directory) generate_output() atexit.register(handle_exit) Calling raising a KeyboardInterupt exception and sys.exit() calls handle_exit() properly, but if I were to do kill {PID} from the terminal it terminates the script without calling handle_exit(). Is there a way to terminate the process that is running in the background, and still have it run handle_exit() before terminating? Try signal.signal . It allows to

Better replacement for exit(), atexit() in C

拜拜、爱过 提交于 2019-12-04 04:03:41
I am new to C programming. I used to think using exit() was the cleanest way of process termination (as it is capable of removing temporary files, closing open files, normal process termination...), but when I tried man exit command on the terminal (Ubuntu 16.04.5, gcc 5.4.0) I saw the following line: The exit() function uses a global variable that is not protected, so it is not thread-safe. After that I tried to make some research about better replacement for exit() (to change my programming behavior from the beginning). While doing that I faced with this question in which side effects of