I'm trying to mock a call to a service but I'm struggeling with the following message: The module factory of jest.mock() is not allowed to reference any out-of-scope variables.
I'm using babel with ES6 syntax, jest and enzyme.
I have a simple component called Vocabulary which gets a list of VocabularyEntry-Objects from a vocabularyService and renders it.
import React from 'react'; import vocabularyService from '../services/vocabularyService'; export default class Vocabulary extends React.Component { render() { let rows = vocabularyService.vocabulary.map((v, i) => <tr key={i}> <td>{v.src}</td> <td>{v.target}</td> </tr> ); // render rows } }
The vocabularyServise ist very simple:
import {VocabularyEntry} from '../model/VocabularyEntry'; class VocabularyService { constructor() { this.vocabulary = [new VocabularyEntry("a", "b")]; } } export default new VocabularyService();`
Now I want to mock the vocabularyService in a test:
import {shallow} from 'enzyme'; import React from 'react'; import Vocabulary from "../../../src/components/Vocabulary "; import {VocabularyEntry} from '../../../src/model/VocabularyEntry' jest.mock('../../../src/services/vocabularyService', () => ({ vocabulary: [new VocabularyEntry("a", "a1")] })); describe("Vocabulary tests", () => { test("renders the vocabulary", () => { let $component = shallow(<Vocabulary/>); // expect something });
});
Running the test causes an error: Vocabulary.spec.js: babel-plugin-jest-hoist: The module factory of jest.mock() is not allowed to reference any out-of-scope variables. Invalid variable access: VocabularyEntry.
As far as I unterstood, I cannot use the VocabularyEntry because it is not declares (as jest moves the mock definition to the top of the file).
Can anyone please explain how I can fix this? I saw solutions which required the references insinde the mock-call but I do not understand how I can do this with a class file.
The problem is that all jest.mock will be hoisted to the top of actual code block at compile time, which is the in this case the top of the file. At this point VocabularyEntry is not imported. You could either put the mock in a beforeAll block in your test or use jest.mock like this:
import {shallow} from 'enzyme'; import React from 'react'; import Vocabulary from "../../../src/components/Vocabulary "; import {VocabularyEntry} from '../../../src/model/VocabularyEntry' import vocabularyService from '../../../src/services/vocabularyService' jest.mock('../../../src/services/vocabularyService', () => jest.fn) vocabularyService.mockImplementation(() => ({ vocabulary: [new VocabularyEntry("a", "a1")] }))
This will first mock the module with a simple spy and after all stuff is imported it sets the real implementation of the mock.
If you are getting similar error when upgrading to newer Jest [19 to 21 in my case], you can try changing jest.mock to jest.doMock.
https://github.com/facebook/jest/commit/6a8c7fb874790ded06f4790fdb33d8416a7284c8
This is how I would solve it for your code.
You need to store your mocked component in a variable with a name prefixed by "mock". This solution is based on the Note at the end of the error message I was getting.
Note: This is a precaution to guard against uninitialized mock variables. If it is ensured that the mock is required lazily, variable names prefixed with mock are permitted.
import {shallow} from 'enzyme'; import React from 'react'; import Vocabulary from "../../../src/components/Vocabulary "; import {VocabularyEntry} from '../../../src/model/VocabularyEntry' const mockVocabulary = () => new VocabularyEntry("a", "a1"); jest.mock('../../../src/services/vocabularyService', () => ({ default: mockVocabulary })); describe("Vocabulary tests", () => { test("renders the vocabulary", () => { let $component = shallow(<Vocabulary/>); // expect something });
Looking at https://github.com/facebook/jest/issues/2567
You could try jest.mock('../../../src/services/vocabularyService', () => ({ const VocabularyEntry= require('../model/VocabularyEntry'); // <= will probably need to be changed to be relative to test file vocabulary: [new VocabularyEntry("a", "a1")] }));
Let me know if that does anything.
