As per TensorFlow documentation , the prefetch
and map
methods of tf.contrib.data.Dataset
class, both have a parameter called buffer_size
.
For prefetch
method, the parameter is known as buffer_size
and according to documentation :
buffer_size: A tf.int64 scalar tf.Tensor, representing the maximum number elements that will be buffered when prefetching.
For the map
method, the parameter is known as output_buffer_size
and according to documentation :
output_buffer_size: (Optional.) A tf.int64 scalar tf.Tensor, representing the maximum number of processed elements that will be buffered.
Similarly for the shuffle
method, the same quantity appears and according to documentation :
buffer_size: A tf.int64 scalar tf.Tensor, representing the number of elements from this dataset from which the new dataset will sample.
What is the relation between these parameters ?
Suppose I create aDataset
object as follows :
tr_data = TFRecordDataset(trainfilenames)
tr_data = tr_data.map(providefortraining, output_buffer_size=10 * trainbatchsize, num_parallel_calls\
=5)
tr_data = tr_data.shuffle(buffer_size= 100 * trainbatchsize)
tr_data = tr_data.prefetch(buffer_size = 10 * trainbatchsize)
tr_data = tr_data.batch(trainbatchsize)
What role is being played by the buffer
parameters in the above snippet ?
TL;DR Despite their similar names, these arguments have quite difference meanings. The buffer_size
in Dataset.shuffle()
can affect the randomness of your dataset, and hence the order in which elements are produced. The buffer_size
in Dataset.prefetch()
only affects the time it takes to produce the next element.
The buffer_size
argument in tf.data.Dataset.prefetch()
and the output_buffer_size
argument in tf.contrib.data.Dataset.map()
provide a way to tune the performance of your input pipeline: both arguments tell TensorFlow to create a buffer of at most buffer_size
elements, and a background thread to fill that buffer in the background.
(Note that we removed the output_buffer_size
argument from Dataset.map()
when it moved from tf.contrib.data
to tf.data
. New code should use Dataset.prefetch()
after map()
to get the same behavior.)
Adding a prefetch buffer can improve performance by overlapping the preprocessing of data with downstream computation. Typically it is most useful to add a small prefetch buffer (with perhaps just a single element) at the very end of the pipeline, but more complex pipelines can benefit from additional prefetching, especially when the time to produce a single element can vary.
By contrast, the buffer_size
argument to tf.data.Dataset.shuffle()
affects the randomness of the transformation. We designed the Dataset.shuffle()
transformation (like the tf.train.shuffle_batch()
function that it replaces) to handle datasets that are too large to fit in memory. Instead of shuffling the entire dataset, it maintains a buffer of buffer_size
elements, and randomly selects the next element from that buffer (replacing it with the next input element, if one is available). Changing the value of buffer_size
affects how uniform the shuffling is: if buffer_size
is greater than the number of elements in the dataset, you get a uniform shuffle; if it is 1
then you get no shuffling at all. For very large datasets, a typical "good enough" approach is to randomly shard the data into multiple files once before training, then shuffle the filenames uniformly, and then use a smaller shuffle buffer. However, the appropriate choice will depend on the exact nature of your training job.
Importance of buffer_size
in shuffle()
I wanted to follow up on the previous answer from @mrry to stress the importance of buffer_size
in tf.data.Dataset.shuffle()
.
Having a low buffer_size
will not just give you inferior shuffling in some cases: it can mess up your whole training.
A practical example: cat classifier
Suppose for instance that you are training a cat classifier on images, and your data is organized in the following way (with 10000
images in each category):
train/
cat/
filename_00001.jpg
filename_00002.jpg
...
not_cat/
filename_10001.jpg
filename_10002.jpg
...
A standard way to input data with tf.data
can be to have a list of filenames and a list of corresponding labels, and use tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices()
to create the dataset:
filenames = ["filename_00001.jpg", "filename_00002.jpg", ...,
"filename_10001.jpg", "filename_10002.jpg", ...]
labels = [1, 1, ..., 0, 0...] # 1 for cat, 0 for not_cat
dataset = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices((filenames, labels))
dataset = dataset.shuffle(buffer_size=1000) # 1000 should be enough right?
dataset = dataset.map(...) # transform to images, preprocess, repeat, batch...
The big issue with the code above is that the dataset will actually not be shuffled in the right way. For about the first half of an epoch, we will only see cat images, and for the second half only non cat images. This will hurt training a lot.
At the beginning of training, the dataset will take the first 1000
filenames and put them in its buffer, then pick one at random among them. Since all the first 1000
images are images of cat, we will only pick cat images at the beginning.
The fix here is to make sure that buffer_size
is larger than 20000
, or to shuffle in advance filenames
and labels
(with the same indices obviously).
Since storing all the filenames and labels in memory is not an issue, we can actually use buffer_size = len(filenames)
to make sure that everything will be shuffled together. Make sure to call tf.data.Dataset.shuffle()
before applying the heavy transformations (like reading the images, processing them, batching...).
dataset = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices((filenames, labels))
dataset = dataset.shuffle(buffer_size=len(filenames))
dataset = dataset.map(...) # transform to images, preprocess, repeat, batch...
The takeaway is to always double check what the shuffling will do. A good way to catch these errors might be to plot the distribution of batches over time (make sure that batches contain about the same distribution as the training set, half cat and half non cat in our example).
Code
import tensorflow as tf
def shuffle():
ds = list(range(0,1000))
dataset = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices(ds)
dataset=dataset.shuffle(buffer_size=500)
dataset = dataset.batch(batch_size=1)
iterator = dataset.make_initializable_iterator()
next_element=iterator.get_next()
init_op = iterator.initializer
with tf.Session() as sess:
sess.run(init_op)
for i in range(100):
print(sess.run(next_element), end='')
shuffle()
Output
[298][326][2][351][92][398][72][134][404][378][238][131][369][324][35][182][441][370][372][144][77][11][199][65][346][418][493][343][444][470][222][83][61][81][366][49][295][399][177][507][288][524][401][386][89][371][181][489][172][159][195][232][160][352][495][241][435][127][268][429][382][479][519][116][395][165][233][37][486][553][111][525][170][571][215][530][47][291][558][21][245][514][103][45][545][219][468][338][392][54][139][339][448][471][589][321][223][311][234][314]
I found that @olivier-moindrot is indeed correct, I tried the code provided by @Houtarou Oreki, using the modifications pointed by @max. The code I used was the following:
fake_data = np.concatenate((np.arange(1,500,1),np.zeros(500)))
dataset = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices(fake_data)
dataset=dataset.shuffle(buffer_size=100)
dataset = dataset.batch(batch_size=10)
iterator = dataset.make_initializable_iterator()
next_element=iterator.get_next()
init_op = iterator.initializer
with tf.Session() as sess:
sess.run(init_op)
for i in range(50):
print(i)
salida = np.array(sess.run(next_element))
print(salida)
print(salida.max())
The code output was indeed a number ranging from 1 to (buffer_size+(i*batch_size)), where i is the number of times you ran next_element. I think the way it is working is the following. First, buffer_size samples are picked in order from the fake_data. Then one by one the batch_size samples are picked from the buffer. Each time a batch sample is picked from the buffer it is replaced by a new one, taken in order from fake_data. I tested this last thing using the following code:
aux = 0
for j in range (10000):
with tf.Session() as sess:
sess.run(init_op)
salida = np.array(sess.run(next_element))
if salida.max() > aux:
aux = salida.max()
print(aux)
The maximum value produced by the code was 109. So you need to assure a balanced sample within your batch_size to ensure a uniform sampling during training.
I also tested what @mrry said about performance, I found that the batch_size will prefetch that amount of samples into memory. I tested this using the following code:
dataset = dataset.shuffle(buffer_size=20)
dataset = dataset.prefetch(10)
dataset = dataset.batch(batch_size=5)
Changing the dataset.prefetch(10) amount resulted in no change in memory (RAM) used. This is important when your data does no fit into RAM. I think the best way is to shuffle your data/file_names before feeding them to tf.dataset, and then control the buffer size using buffer_size.
Actually the answer by @olivier-moindrot is not correct.
You can verify it by creating filenames and labels as he/she mention and print the shuffle values.
You will see each shuffle procedure will generate sample randomly with the size equals to buffer size from the dataset.
dataset = dataset.shuffle(buffer_size=1000)
iterator = dataset.make_one_shot_iterator()
next_element = iterator.get_next()
with tf.Session() as sess:
for i in range(1000):
print(sess.run(next_element))
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46444018/meaning-of-buffer-size-in-dataset-map-dataset-prefetch-and-dataset-shuffle