问题
According to https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57250, GCC 4.9 has support for atomic shared_ptr
operations.
Using GCC 4.9.2, I'm able to compile a program that uses atomic shared_ptr
. The -mcx16
flag is required, as the GCC implementation on x86_64 apparently requires cmpxchg16b
, which makes sense as I would assume that an atomic operation on a shared_ptr
would require atomically updating both the pointer itself and the reference count at the same time.
However, when I try to actually use the atomic shared_ptr
library, it does not behave as I expect. So, either I am not using this properly, or the GCC implementation is defective. Most of the time I'd be 99% confident that I'm just doing it wrong, but since this is a relatively new feature and since the behavior seems so bizarre, I'm only about 50% confident that it's my fault in this case.
Here is a simple program that creates an atomic shared_ptr
, then performs a series of concurrent reads and writes on the shared_ptr:
void test()
{
std::atomic<std::shared_ptr<int>> p(std::shared_ptr<int>(new int(10)));
std::cout << "Use count : " << p.load().use_count() << std::endl;
std::cout << "Initial value of p : " << *(p.load()) << std::endl;
std::vector<std::thread> threads;
const std::size_t num_threads = 8;
for (std::size_t i = 0; i != num_threads; ++i)
{
threads.emplace_back([&p, i](){
std::shared_ptr<int> x = p.load();
while (!p.compare_exchange_weak(
x,
std::shared_ptr<int>(new int(i + 5))
)) ;
});
}
for (auto& t : threads) t.join();
std::cout << "Use count : " << p.load().use_count() << std::endl;
std::cout << "Final value of p : " << *(p.load()) << std::endl;
}
When I compile and run, the output is:
~$ g++ test2.cpp -o test2 -std=c++11 -lpthread -mcx16
~$ ./test2
Use count : 1
Initial value of p : 0
Use count : 0
Final value of p : 0
But this output makes no sense to me. Firstly, after initializing the atomic shared_ptr
to a value of 10
, when I load it and read the initial value (before any threads are spawned), I get a 0
. Secondly, after all the threads join, the value is still 0
, even though no thread could have possibly set it to 0
. And most bizarrely, after the threads join, the use_count()
of the shared_ptr is 0
! Yet the atomic shared_ptr
object is still in scope, and thus the use count should be 1
.
I'm pretty sure the GCC implementation is flawed here, but according to the link I posted above, GCC 4.9 has a completed atomic shared_ptr
implementation, and...
~$ gcc --version
~$ gcc (Debian 4.9.2-10) 4.9.2
So... what exactly is going on here? I'd like to get some kind of confirmation that either the GCC 4.9.2 implementation here is flawed or incomplete, or I'm just totally wrong/confused about how to use atomic shared_ptr
.
回答1:
"atomic shared_ptr
operations" refers to the free std::atomic_(store|load|exchange|compare_exchange_strong|compare_exchange_weak)(_explicit)?
function templates for shared_ptr
, documented here. GCC doesn't have them until 5. (Fun fact: its implementation actually uses a global array of 16 mutexes under the hood.)
Instantiating std::atomic
over std::shared_ptr
results in undefined behavior, as std::atomic
requires a trivially copyable type.
The concurrency TS has std::experimental::atomic_shared_ptr
.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37198325/gcc-atomic-shared-ptr-implementation