According to the chart here, the equivalent data type in Java to C#'s Decimal
is BigDecimal
.
Is this really so? What's up with the "Big" preamble? There doesn't seem to be a "SmallDecimal" or "LittleDecimal" (let alone "MediumSizedDecimal") in Java.
I must say, though, that chart was the clearest thing I found on the subject; the other links here and here and here were about as clear to me as the Mississippi River after a torrential tempest.
Yep - that's the corresponding type.
Since you are using Java after C# - don't be too surprised to find little nuances like this - or be too upset when there is no easy way to do something that's "easy" to do C#. The first thing that comes to my mind is int & int? - in Java you just use int and Integer.
C# had the luxury of coming after Java so lots of (what I subjectively see as) bad decisions have been fixed/streamlined. Also, it helps that C# was designed by Andres Hejlsberg (who is arguably one of the best programming language designers alive) and is regularly "updated" unlike Java (you probably witnessed all things added to C# since 2000 - complete list)
Is this really so?
They are similar but not identical. To be more specific: the Java version can represent every value that the C# version can, but the opposite is not true.
What's up with the "Big" preamble?
A Java BigDecimal
can have arbitrarily much precision and therefore can be arbitrarily large. If you want to make a BigDecimal
with a thousand places of precision, you go right ahead.
By contrast, a C# decimal
has a fixed size; it takes up 128 bits and gives you 28 decimal places of precision.
To be more precise: both types give you numbers of the form
+/- someInteger / 10 ^ someExponent
In C#, someInteger
is a 96 bit unsigned integer and someExponent
is an integer between 0 and 28.
In Java, someInteger
is of arbitrary size and someExponent
is a signed 32 bit integer.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/23017583/is-javas-bigdecimal-the-closest-data-type-corresponding-to-cs-decimal