问题
I have the following code example that doesn't compile:
#include <stdio.h>
namespace my
{
class base1
{ // line 6
};
class base2: private base1
{
};
class derived: private base2
{
public:
// The following function just wants to print a pointer, nothing else!
void print(base1* pointer) {printf("%p\n", pointer);}
};
}
The error that gcc prints is:
test.cpp:6: error: `class my::base1' is inaccessible
test.cpp:17: error: within this context
Now, i can guess what the problem is: when looking at the declaration of print
, the compiler sees base1
and thinks: base1
is the base-class subobject of derived* this
, but you don't have access to it! While i intend that base1
should be just a type name.
How can i see in the C++ Standard that this is a correct behavior, and not a bug in the compiler (i am sure it's not a bug; all compilers i checked behaved so)?
How should i fix this error? All the following fixes work, but which one should i choose?
void print(class base1* pointer) {}
void print(::my:: base1* pointer) {}
class base1; void print(base1* pointer) {}
Edit:
int main()
{
my::base1 object1;
my::derived object3;
object3.print(&object1);
}
回答1:
The section you're looking for is 11.1. It suggests using ::my::base1* to work around this:
[ Note: In a derived class, the lookup of a base class name will find the injected-class-name instead of the name of the base class in the scope in which it was declared. The injected-class-name might be less accessible than the name of the base class in the scope in which it was declared. — end note ]
[ Example:
class A { };
class B : private A { };
class C : public B {
A *p;
// error: injected-class-name A is inaccessible
:: A * q ;
// OK
};
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5634637/private-inheritance-name-lookup-error