The StackOverflow question "using static keyword in objective-c when defining a cached variable" references code from Example 4 of Xcode's TableViewSuite that defines a static NSDateFormatter
and calls alloc
but never calls release
.
Shouldn't static
variables be released? If yes, where in the code should they be released? If no, why not?
Shouldn't
static
variables be released? If yes, where in the code should they be released? If no, why not?
It depends. If the variable is initialized only once, and should stay around for the lifetime of the application, then no, it shouldn't be released (its memory will essentially be freed when the application exits, anyway). If, however, the value of the static variable changes, then yes, the previous object should be released when the static variable is set to a new object.
As the accepted answer to that question already states, releasing static variables is impossible. They act like global variables that are only visible to your function with a lifetime as long as your program.
If you are concerned about bloat because of variables that that static variable holds on to, then you should (somehow) release those references. Thus, for example, if your static variable is an NSMutableArray, and you keep adding objects inside, it will always keep growing, unless you, at some point, empty the array.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5568691/how-to-release-static-objective-c-variables