NSMutableArray *arr = [NSMutableArray array];
[arr addObject:@"1"];
[arr addObject:@"2"];
[arr addObject:@"3"];
// This statement is fine.
XCTAssertTrue(arr.count == 3, @"Wrong array size.");
// This assertion fails with an error: ((arr.count) equal to (3)) failed: ("3") is not equal to ("3")
XCTAssertEqual(arr.count, 3, @"Wrong array size.");
What don't I understand about XCTAssertEqual? Why does the last assertion fail?
I have also had quite a bit of trouble with Xcode 5's tests. It still seems quite buggy with some odd behaviour - however I have found the definitive reason your particular XCTAssertEqual
isn't working.
If we have a look at the test code we see it actually does the following (taken directly from XCTestsAssertionsImpl.h
- it may be easier to view there):
#define _XCTPrimitiveAssertEqual(a1, a2, format...) \
({ \
@try { \
__typeof__(a1) a1value = (a1); \
__typeof__(a2) a2value = (a2); \
NSValue *a1encoded = [NSValue value:&a1value withObjCType:@encode(__typeof__(a1))]; \
NSValue *a2encoded = [NSValue value:&a2value withObjCType:@encode(__typeof__(a2))]; \
float aNaN = NAN; \
NSValue *aNaNencoded = [NSValue value:&aNaN withObjCType:@encode(__typeof__(aNaN))]; \
if ([a1encoded isEqualToValue:aNaNencoded] || [a2encoded isEqualToValue:aNaNencoded] || ![a1encoded isEqualToValue:a2encoded]) { \
_XCTRegisterFailure(_XCTFailureDescription(_XCTAssertion_Equal, 0, @#a1, @#a2, _XCTDescriptionForValue(a1encoded), _XCTDescriptionForValue(a2encoded)),format); \
} \
} \
@catch (id exception) { \
_XCTRegisterFailure(_XCTFailureDescription(_XCTAssertion_Equal, 1, @#a1, @#a2, [exception reason]),format); \
}\
})
Here's the problem:
What the test is actually doing is encoding the values into an NSValue
and then comparing them. "Okay," you say, "but what's the problem with that?" I didn't think there was one either until I made my own test case for it. The problem is that NSValue's -isEqualToValue
must also compare the NSValue's encoding type as well as its actual value. Both must be equal for the method to return YES
.
In your case, arr.count
is an NSUInteger
which is a typedef of unsigned int
. The compile-time constant 3
presumably degenerates into a signed int
at runtime. Thus when the two are put into an NSValue
object, their encoding types are not equal and thus the two CANNOT be equal according to -[NSValue isEqualToValue]
.
You can prove this with a custom example. The following code explicitly does exactly what XCTAssertEqual
does:
// Note explicit types
unsigned int a1 = 3;
signed int a2 = 3;
__typeof__(a1) a1value = (a1);
__typeof__(a2) a2value = (a2);
NSValue *a1encoded = [NSValue value:&a1value withObjCType:@encode(__typeof__(a1))];
NSValue *a2encoded = [NSValue value:&a2value withObjCType:@encode(__typeof__(a2))];
if (![a1encoded isEqualToValue:a2encoded]) {
NSLog(@"3 != 3 :(");
}
"3 != 3 :("
will appear in the log every time.
I hasten to add here that this is, in fact, expected behaviour. NSValue
is supposed to check its type encoding when doing comparisons. Unfortunately it's just not what we were expecting when testing two ('equal') integers.
XCTAssertTrue
, incidentally, has much more straightforward logic, and behaves generally as expected (again, see the actual source for how it determines whether the assertion fails).
I have had this problem, too. As @ephemera and @napier indicated, this is a type issue.
It can be solved by supplying a value of the correct type, using the c-literal modifiers.
XCTAssertEqual(arr.count, 3ul, @"Wrong array size.");
You can find the correct type by looking up the return type of the function used on the left hand side - ALT-click
on arr.count
:
- (NSUInteger)count;
Now ALT-click on NSUInteger
to find its type:
typedef unsigned long NSUInteger;
Now find the c literal numeric format for unsigned long - google is a good friend but this page works:
http://www.tutorialspoint.com/cprogramming/c_constants.htm
As a quick hint here, you may need to use U (unsigned) L (long) or F (float), and make sure you write 1.0 instead of 1 to get a double. Lowercase also works, as in my example above.
In case someone else is looking for the issue lead by double comparing like me (solution above won't work for float & double), try:
XCTAssertEqualWithAccuracy(number.doubleValue, 12.34, 0.01);
Generates a failure when (difference between (\a expression1) and (\a expression2) is > (\a accuracy))).
One alternative is to just use casting:
XCTAssertEqual(arr.count, (NSUInteger)3, @"Wrong array size.");
It might be the best solution with the current state of the tools, especially if you have code where you're using XCTAssertEqual
a lot and don't want to switch to XCTAssertTrue
.
(I noticed @RobNapier made this suggestion in a comment.)
I got snagged by this issue as well, very thankful for the workarounds provided here. Quick FYI, it seems this was fixed in Xcode 5.1 release.
The XCTAssertEqual macro (formerly STAssertEquals using OCUnit) correctly compares scalar values of different types without casting, for example, int and NSInteger. It can no longer accept nonscalar types, such as structs, for comparison. (14435933)
I have not yet upgraded from Xcode 5.0.2 but my colleague has, and the same XC tests that were previously failing due to this problem are now passing without the casting workaround.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19178109/xctassertequal-error-3-is-not-equal-to-3