问题
I am designing some architectural changes into a legacy ASP.NET application. I prototyped some classes for dependency resolution that mimic the ASP.NET MVC\'s IDependencyResolver. I won\'t post because it is pretty much the same interface, but in other natural language.
I figured out it might be considered Service Location, which in turn is usually (not fully in some cases) condemned in favor of Dependency Injection. Nevertheless, I couldn\'t find any recommendation against the use of the ASP.NET MVC\'s dependency resolution implementation.
Is the ASP.NET MVC\'s IDependencyResolver considered an anti-pattern? Is it a bad thing?
回答1:
If you look at the signature you will see that it's just a Service Locator with another name. Service Locator is an anti-pattern and I consider the relationship transitive, so I consider IDependencyResolver an anti-pattern.
Apart from that, the interface is also broken because it has no Release method.
回答2:
I don't believe so... You can inject any IoC you want into ASP.NET MVC, which seems like a pretty good pattern to me.
Here's a blog post about injecting Unity into ASP.NET MVC 3.
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5653783/is-idependencyresolver-an-anti-pattern