Empty or “flush” a file descriptor without read()?

笑着哭i 提交于 2019-11-30 01:49:35

问题


(Note: This is not a question of how to flush a write(). This is the other end of it, so to speak.)

Is it possible to empty a file descriptor that has data to be read in it without having to read() it? You might not be interested in the data, and reading it all would therefore waste space and cycles you might have better uses for.

If it is not possible in POSIX, do any operating systems have any non-portable ways to do this?

UPDATE: Please note that I'm talking about file descriptors, not streams.


回答1:


Streams have fclean available, which flushes the write buffer, and returns the read buffer back to the IO system.

http://www.gnu.org/software/hello/manual/libc/Cleaning-Streams.html

If what you really want to do is skip bytes, repositioning the file pointer is the correct action. Just skip ahead as many bytes as you don't want to read.

http://www.gnu.org/software/hello/manual/libc/File-Position-Primitive.html#File-Position-Primitive




回答2:


If you're dealing with a tty, have a look at tcflush():

#include <termios.h>
int tcflush(int fildes, int queue_selector);

Upon successful completion, tcflush() discards data written to the object referred to by fildes (an open file descriptor associated with a terminal) but not transmitted, or data received but not read, depending on the value of queue_selector [...]

http://opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908775/xsh/tcflush.html




回答3:


For POSIX, use lseek(2) or lseek64(3) to seek ahead. For Windows, use SetFilePointer() or SetFilePointerEx().




回答4:


Neither read() nor flush() are part of Standard C or C++, but certainly none of the standard functions support flushing of input streams. I would guess this reflects something not available in the underlying operating systems. The normal way to avoid reading something altogether is to skip over it with a seek() function of some sort.




回答5:


If you know the number of bytes to skip, you can do lseek(fd, n, SEEK_CUR); for POSIX systems. There is fseek() as well, for FILE * objects. In POSIX, I think you can safely seek past the end of file, the idea is that if more data is written later, so as to make data go past the position set with lseek(), you will be able to read more data now.




回答6:


According to this, a POSIX system will do this on fflush(stream); .

For a stream open for reading, if the file is not already at EOF, and the file is one capable of seeking, the file offset of the underlying open file description shall be adjusted so that the next operation on the open file description deals with the byte after the last one read from or written to the stream being flushed.




回答7:


Linux 2.6.17 or later with the GNU C library version 2.5 or later contain the splice() system call, which can be used to send data from one file descriptor to another without copying it to user space. This can be used to discard data by simply opening /dev/null and spliceing data from the source file descriptor into the /dev/null file descriptor.



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1924173/empty-or-flush-a-file-descriptor-without-read

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!