问题
Is there any reason something like this would not work?
This is the logic I have used many times to update a record in a table with LINQ:
DataClasses1DataContext db = new DataClasses1DataContext();
User updateUser = db.Users.Single(e => e.user == user);
updateUser.InUse = !updateUser.InUse;
db.Log = new System.IO.StreamWriter(@\"c:\\temp\\linq.log\") { AutoFlush = true };
db.SubmitChanges();
(updateUser.InUse is a bit field)
For some reason it isn\'t working. When I check the linq.log it is completely blank.
Could there be a problem with my .dbml? Other tables seem to work fine but I\'ve compared properties in the .dbml and they all match.
It\'s as if the db.SubmitChanges()
; does not detect any updates being required.
回答1:
The table could not be updated properly because it had no primary key. (Actually it had the column but the constraint was not copied when I did a SELECT INTO my dev table). The DataContext class requires a primary key for updates.
回答2:
Is the InUse property a "normal" one as far as LINQ is concerned? (e.g. it's not autogenerated or anything funky like that?)
Alternatively, I don't suppose it's a Nullable<bool> is it, with a current value of null? If so, your update line isn't actually doing anything - for nullable Booleans, !null = null.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/206532/linq-not-updating-on-submitchanges