问题
When I run this code:
print re.search(r'1', '1').groups()
I get a result of ()
. However, .group(0)
gives me the match.
Shouldn't groups()
give me something containing the match?
Update: Thanks for the answers. So that means if I do re.search()
with no subgroups, I have to use groups(0)
to get a match?
回答1:
groups is empty since you do not have any capturing groups - http://docs.python.org/library/re.html#re.MatchObject.groups. group(0) will always returns the whole text that was matched regardless of if it was captured in a group or not
Edited.
回答2:
To the best of my knowledge, .groups()
returns a tuple of remembered groups. I.e. those groups in the regular expression that are enclosed in parentheses. So if you were to write:
print re.search(r'(1)', '1').groups()
you would get
('1',)
as your response. In general, .groups()
will return a tuple of all the groups of objects in the regular expression that are enclosed within parentheses.
回答3:
You have no groups in your regex, therefore you get an empty list (()
) as result.
Try
re.search(r'(1)', '1').groups()
With the brackets you are creating a capturing group, the result that matches this part of the pattern, is stored in a group.
Then you get
('1',)
as result.
回答4:
The reason for this is that you have no capturing groups (since you don't use ()
in the pattern).
http://docs.python.org/library/re.html#re.MatchObject.groups
And group(0)
returns the entire search result (even if it has no capturing groups at all):
http://docs.python.org/library/re.html#re.MatchObject.group
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7312020/why-wont-re-groups-give-me-anything-for-my-one-correctly-matched-group