问题
Python 3.4 introduces a new module enum, which adds an enumerated type to the language. The documentation for enum.Enum provides an example to demonstrate how it can be extended:
>>> class Planet(Enum):
... MERCURY = (3.303e+23, 2.4397e6)
... VENUS = (4.869e+24, 6.0518e6)
... EARTH = (5.976e+24, 6.37814e6)
... MARS = (6.421e+23, 3.3972e6)
... JUPITER = (1.9e+27, 7.1492e7)
... SATURN = (5.688e+26, 6.0268e7)
... URANUS = (8.686e+25, 2.5559e7)
... NEPTUNE = (1.024e+26, 2.4746e7)
... def __init__(self, mass, radius):
... self.mass = mass # in kilograms
... self.radius = radius # in meters
... @property
... def surface_gravity(self):
... # universal gravitational constant (m3 kg-1 s-2)
... G = 6.67300E-11
... return G * self.mass / (self.radius * self.radius)
...
>>> Planet.EARTH.value
(5.976e+24, 6378140.0)
>>> Planet.EARTH.surface_gravity
9.802652743337129
This example also demonstrates a problem with Enum: in the surface_gravity() property method, a constant G is defined which would normally be defined at class level - but attempting to do so inside an Enum would simply add it as one of the members of the enum, so instead it\'s been defined inside the method.
If the class wanted to use this constant in other methods, it\'d have to be defined there as well, which obviously isn\'t ideal.
Is there any way to define a class constant inside an Enum, or some workaround to achieve the same effect?
回答1:
This is advanced behavior which will not be needed in 90+% of the enumerations created.
According to the docs:
The rules for what is allowed are as follows:
_sunder_names (starting and ending with a single underscore) are reserved by enum and cannot be used; all other attributes defined within an enumeration will become members of this enumeration, with the exception of__dunder__names anddescriptors(methods are also descriptors).
So if you want a class constant you have several choices:
- create it in
__init__ - add it after the class has been created
- use a mixin
- create your own
descriptor
Creating the constant in __init__ and adding it after the class has been created both suffer from not having all the class info gathered in one place.
Mixins can certainly be used when appropriate (see dnozay's answer for a good example), but that case can also be simplified by having a base Enum class with the actual constants built in.
First, the constant that will be used in the examples below:
class Constant: # use Constant(object) if in Python 2
def __init__(self, value):
self.value = value
def __get__(self, *args):
return self.value
def __repr__(self):
return '%s(%r)' % (self.__class__.__name__, self.value)
And the single-use Enum example:
from enum import Enum
class Planet(Enum):
MERCURY = (3.303e+23, 2.4397e6)
VENUS = (4.869e+24, 6.0518e6)
EARTH = (5.976e+24, 6.37814e6)
MARS = (6.421e+23, 3.3972e6)
JUPITER = (1.9e+27, 7.1492e7)
SATURN = (5.688e+26, 6.0268e7)
URANUS = (8.686e+25, 2.5559e7)
NEPTUNE = (1.024e+26, 2.4746e7)
# universal gravitational constant
G = Constant(6.67300E-11)
def __init__(self, mass, radius):
self.mass = mass # in kilograms
self.radius = radius # in meters
@property
def surface_gravity(self):
return self.G * self.mass / (self.radius * self.radius)
print(Planet.__dict__['G']) # Constant(6.673e-11)
print(Planet.G) # 6.673e-11
print(Planet.NEPTUNE.G) # 6.673e-11
print(Planet.SATURN.surface_gravity) # 10.44978014597121
And, finally, the multi-use Enum example:
from enum import Enum
class AstronomicalObject(Enum):
# universal gravitational constant
G = Constant(6.67300E-11)
def __init__(self, mass, radius):
self.mass = mass
self.radius = radius
@property
def surface_gravity(self):
return self.G * self.mass / (self.radius * self.radius)
class Planet(AstronomicalObject):
MERCURY = (3.303e+23, 2.4397e6)
VENUS = (4.869e+24, 6.0518e6)
EARTH = (5.976e+24, 6.37814e6)
MARS = (6.421e+23, 3.3972e6)
JUPITER = (1.9e+27, 7.1492e7)
SATURN = (5.688e+26, 6.0268e7)
URANUS = (8.686e+25, 2.5559e7)
NEPTUNE = (1.024e+26, 2.4746e7)
class Asteroid(AstronomicalObject):
CERES = (9.4e+20 , 4.75e+5)
PALLAS = (2.068e+20, 2.72e+5)
JUNOS = (2.82e+19, 2.29e+5)
VESTA = (2.632e+20 ,2.62e+5
Planet.MERCURY.surface_gravity # 3.7030267229659395
Asteroid.CERES.surface_gravity # 0.27801085872576176
Note:
The Constant G really isn't. One could rebind G to something else:
Planet.G = 1
If you really need it to be constant (aka not rebindable), then use the new aenum library [1] which will block attempts to reassign constants as well as Enum members.
1 Disclosure: I am the author of the Python stdlib Enum, the enum34 backport, and the Advanced Enumeration (aenum) library.
回答2:
The most elegant solution (IMHO) is to use mixins / base class to provide the correct behavior.
- base class to provide the behavior that's needed for all implementation that's common to e.g.
SatelliteandPlanet. - mixins are interesting if you decide to provide optional behavior (e.g.
SatelliteandPlanetmay have to provide a different behavior)
Here is an example, where you first define your behavior:
#
# business as usual, define your class, methods, constants...
#
class AstronomicalObject:
# universal gravitational constant
G = 6.67300E-11
def __init__(self, mass, radius):
self.mass = mass # in kilograms
self.radius = radius # in meters
class PlanetModel(AstronomicalObject):
@property
def surface_gravity(self):
return self.G * self.mass / (self.radius * self.radius)
class SatelliteModel(AstronomicalObject):
FUEL_PRICE_PER_KG = 20000
@property
def fuel_cost(self):
return self.FUEL_PRICE_PER_KG * self.mass
def falling_rate(self, destination):
return complicated_formula(self.G, self.mass, destination)
Then create your Enum with the correct base classes / mixins.
#
# then create your Enum with the correct model.
#
class Planet(PlanetModel, Enum):
MERCURY = (3.303e+23, 2.4397e6)
VENUS = (4.869e+24, 6.0518e6)
EARTH = (5.976e+24, 6.37814e6)
MARS = (6.421e+23, 3.3972e6)
JUPITER = (1.9e+27, 7.1492e7)
SATURN = (5.688e+26, 6.0268e7)
URANUS = (8.686e+25, 2.5559e7)
NEPTUNE = (1.024e+26, 2.4746e7)
class Satellite(SatelliteModel, Enum):
GPS1 = (12.0, 1.7)
GPS2 = (22.0, 1.5)
回答3:
from enum import Enum
class classproperty(object):
"""A class property decorator"""
def __init__(self, getter):
self.getter = getter
def __get__(self, instance, owner):
return self.getter(owner)
class classconstant(object):
"""A constant property from given value,
visible in class and instances"""
def __init__(self, value):
self.value = value
def __get__(self, instance, owner):
return self.value
class strictclassconstant(classconstant):
"""A constant property that is
callable only from the class """
def __get__(self, instance, owner):
if instance:
raise AttributeError(
"Strict class constants are not available in instances")
return self.value
class Planet(Enum):
MERCURY = (3.303e+23, 2.4397e6)
VENUS = (4.869e+24, 6.0518e6)
EARTH = (5.976e+24, 6.37814e6)
MARS = (6.421e+23, 3.3972e6)
JUPITER = (1.9e+27, 7.1492e7)
SATURN = (5.688e+26, 6.0268e7)
URANUS = (8.686e+25, 2.5559e7)
NEPTUNE = (1.024e+26, 2.4746e7)
def __init__(self, mass, radius):
self.mass = mass # in kilograms
self.radius = radius # in meters
G = classconstant(6.67300E-11)
@property
def surface_gravity(self):
# universal gravitational constant (m3 kg-1 s-2)
return Planet.G * self.mass / (self.radius * self.radius)
print(Planet.MERCURY.surface_gravity)
print(Planet.G)
print(Planet.MERCURY.G)
class ConstantExample(Enum):
HAM = 1
SPAM = 2
@classproperty
def c1(cls):
return 1
c2 = classconstant(2)
c3 = strictclassconstant(3)
print(ConstantExample.c1, ConstantExample.HAM.c1)
print(ConstantExample.c2, ConstantExample.SPAM.c2)
print(ConstantExample.c3)
# This should fail:
print(ConstantExample.HAM.c3)
The reason why @property does NOT work and classconstant DOES work is quite simple, and explained in the answer here
The reason that the actual property object is returned when you access it via a class Hello.foo lies in how the property implements the
__get__(self, instance, owner)special method. If a descriptor is accessed on an instance, then that instance is passed as the appropriate argument, and owner is the class of that instance.On the other hand, if it is accessed through the class, then instance is None and only owner is passed. The property object recognizes this and returns self.
Thus, the code in classproperty is actually a generalization of property, lacking the if instance is None part.
回答4:
A property can be used to provide most of the behaviour of a class constant:
class Planet(Enum):
# ...
@property
def G(self):
return 6.67300E-11
# ...
@property
def surface_gravity(self):
return self.G * self.mass / (self.radius * self.radius)
This would be a little unwieldy if you wanted to define a large number of constants, so you could define a helper function outside the class:
def constant(c):
"""Return a class property that returns `c`."""
return property(lambda self: c)
... and use it as follows:
class Planet(Enum):
# ...
G = constant(6.67300E-11)
One limitation of this approach is that it will only work for instances of the class, and not the class itself:
>>> Planet.EARTH.G
6.673e-11
>>> Planet.G
<property object at 0x7f665921ce58>
回答5:
TLDR; NO, it can not be done inside an Enum class.
This said, as the other answers showed, there are ways to get such class owned values associated to an Enum (i.e. via class inheritance / mixins) but such values are not "defined .. inside an Enum".
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/17911188/is-it-possible-to-define-a-class-constant-inside-an-enum