问题
I\'m trying to debug the source of a SQL timeout in a web application that I maintain. I have the source code of the C# code behind, so I know exactly what code is running. I have debugged the application right down to the line that executes the SQL code that times out, and I watch the query running in SQL profiler.
When this query executes from the web, it times out after 30 seconds. However, when I cut/paste the query exactly as presented in Profiler, and I put it into SSMS and run it, it returns almost instantly. I have traced the problem to ARITHABORT being set to OFF in the connection that the web is using (that is, if I turn ARITHABORT OFF in the SSMS session, it runs for a long time, and if I turn it back ON then it runs very quickly). However, reading the description of ARITHABORT, it doesn\'t seem to apply... I\'m only doing a simple SELECT, and there is NO arithmetic being performed at all.. just a single INNER JOIN with a WHERE condition:
Why would ARITHABORT OFF be causing this behavior in this context?? Is there any way I can alter the ARITHABORT setting for that connection from SSMS? I\'m using SQL Server 2008.
回答1:
So your C# code is sending an ad hoc SQL query to SQL Server, using what method? Have you considered using a stored procedure? That would probably ensure the same performance (at least in the engine) regardless of who called it.
Why? The ARITHABORT setting is one of the things the optimizer looks at when it is determining how to execute your query (more specifically, for plan matching). It is possible that the plan in cache has the same setting as SSMS, so it uses the cached plan, but with the opposite setting your C# code is forcing a recompile (or perhaps you are hitting a really BAD plan in the cache), which can certainly hurt performance in a lot of cases.
If you are already calling a stored procedure (you didn't post your query, though I think you meant to), you can try adding OPTION (RECOMPILE) to the offending query (or queries) in the stored procedure. This will mean those statements will always recompile, but it could prevent the use of the bad plan you seem to be hitting. Another option is to make sure that when the stored procedure is compiled, the batch is executed with SET ARITHABORT ON.
Finally, you seem to be asking how you can change the ARITHABORT setting in SSMS. I think what you meant to ask is how you can force the ARITHABORT setting in your code. If you decide to continue sending ad hoc SQL from your C# app, then of course you can send a command as text that has multiple statements separated by semi-colons, e.g.:
SET ARITHABORT ON; SELECT ...
For more info on why this issue occurs, see Erland Sommarskog's great article:
- Slow in the Application, Fast in SSMS? Understanding Performance Mysteries
回答2:
This answer includes a way to resolve this issue:
By running the following commands as administrator on the database all queries run as expected regardless of the ARITHABORT setting.
DBCC DROPCLEANBUFFERS
DBCC FREEPROCCACHE
Update
It seems that most people end up having this problem occur very rarely, and the above technique is a decent one-time fix. But if a specific query exhibits this problem more than once, a more long-term solution to this problem would be to use Query Hints like OPTIMIZE FOR and OPTION(Recompile), as described in this article.
回答3:
I've had this problem many times before but if you have a stored procedure with the same problem dropping and recreating the stored proc will solve the issue.
It's called parameter sniffing. You need to always localize the parameters in the stored proc to avoid this issue in the future.
I understand this might not be what the original poster wants but might help someone with the same issue.
回答4:
If using Entity Framework you must be aware that query parameters for string values are sent to database as nvarchar by default, if database column to compare is typed varchar, depending on your collation, query execution plan may require an "IMPLICIT CONVERSION" step, that forces a full scan. I could confirm it by looking in database monitoring in expensive queries option, which displays the execution plan.
Finally, a explanation on this behavior in this article: https://www.sqlskills.com/blogs/jonathan/implicit-conversions-that-cause-index-scans/
回答5:
I had the same problem and it was fixed by executing procedure "WITH RECOMPILE". You can also try using parameter sniffing. My issue was related to SQL cache.
回答6:
If you can change your code to fix parameter sniffing optimize for unknown hint is your best option. If you cannot change your code the best option is exec sp_recompile 'name of proc' which will force only that one stored proc to get a new execution plan. Dropping and recreating a proc would have a similar effect but could cause errors if someone tries to execute the proc while you have it dropped. DBCC FREEPROCCACHE drops all your cached plans which can wreck havoc ok your system up to and including causing lots of timeouts in a heavy transactions production environment. Setting arithabort is not a solution to the problem but is a useful tool for discovering if parameter sniffing is the issue.
回答7:
I have the same problem when trying to call SP from SMSS it took 2 sec, while from the webapp (ASP.NET) it took about 3 min.
I've tried all suggested solutions sp_recompile, DBCC FREEPROCCACHE and DBCC DROPCLEANBUFFERS but nothing fixed my problem, but when tried parameter sniffing it did the trick, and worked just fine.
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2248112/query-times-out-when-executed-from-web-but-super-fast-when-executed-from-ssms