How resolve multiple conflicts with “git mergetool” without having to close the editor between files?

问题

I\'ve found git mergetool to be a handy utility for merging diffs visually, but the way I\'m going about it seems really wonky. Essentially, my process looks like this when conflicts are reported:

Execute a git mergetool
At the prompt, hit Enter to launch my diff tool (Meld or FileMerge, depending on which computer)
Resolve the conflicts
Save the changes
Close the diff tool

If I have more than one conflict, rinse, repeat. Yep, that\'s me opening and closing my diff viewer once for each conflict in the merge. Since it\'s launched from the command line, closing it is the only way I know of to tell git mergetool that I\'ve resolved this particular conflict and that it can move on to the next.

Surely there\'s a better way, but I have no idea. Li\'l help, please? This process seems crazy inefficient.

回答1:

At first glance, it does not seem possible to reuse an external diff tool session.

The git-mergetool documentation clearly states:

If the custom merge tool correctly indicates the success of a merge resolution with its exit code, then the configuration variable mergetool.<tool>.trustExitCode can be set to true.
Otherwise, git-mergetool will prompt the user to indicate the success of the resolution after the custom tool has exited.

So the exit code (or the validation of the user after the exit of the diff tool) is needed, implying that the user first close the external diff tool.

That seems a great incentive to reduce the number of conflicts on each merge/rebase one attempts ;) (whatever the VCScs tool used)

Note:
Two other git external diff tools settings ("Setting up diff and merge tools for Git on Windows" and "Setting up SourceGear DiffMerge with Git") do not give more hopes when it come to not closing the external diff tool...

回答2:

If your mergetool of choice supports opening files in an existing instance, you can specify the command in your git config:

% git config mergetool.whatever_you_want.cmd 'exec /path/to/merge/tool $LOCAL $MERGED $REMOTE'
% git config merge.tool whatever_you_want

git mergetool will then execute your custom command and then prompt you as to whether the file was merged successfully (in lieu of looking at an exit code).

An example I just hacked together for vimdiff:

% git config mergetool.persistent.cmd 'gvim --remote-tab-silent "+set buftype=nowrite" "$PWD/$BASE" && sleep 1; gvim --remote-send ":split $PWD/$REMOTE<CR>:set buftype=nowrite<CR>:vertical diffsplit $PWD/$MERGED<CR>:vertical diffsplit $PWD/$LOCAL<CR>:set buftype=nowrite<CR><C-W>l"'

This works well enough, I may start using it myself!

回答3:

The problem for mergetool is that it deliberately uses a command line interface to initiate a merge session and then waits for the invoked command to return to determine when the user driven merge has completed.

Most merge tools don't provide a command line mechanism for starting a merge session in an already running process with a way for determining when the resolution has been completed and whether successful or not.

It is conceivable that some merge tools could provide this functionality through a separate wrapper command and some sort of IPC, but it would be exceedingly tool specific and difficult to implement in the generic mergetool program.

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/585844/how-resolve-multiple-conflicts-with-git-mergetool-without-having-to-close-the

标签

git

diff

mergetool