Java applet manifest - Allow all Caller-Allowable-Codebase

问题

As of Java 7u45 an applet will display a warning message (even if signed with a trusted cert) if a webpage tries to interact with it via javascript and that page isn\'t listed in the manifest\'s Caller-Allowable-Codebase attribute.

Release notes about this change: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/7u45-relnotes-2016950.html

Oracle blog post about this bug: https://blogs.oracle.com/java-platform-group/entry/7u45_caller_allowable_codebase_and

Attribute description: http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/jweb/manifest.html#caller_allowable

I have tried just a wildcard (*), but I still get the warning.

Is there a way around this other than listing all codebases it may run at?

The reason this is a problem for me is that this applet runs on many different machines and networks, but always on intranets at various locations. This applet also needs to communicate with javascript because it talks to local USB scales and displays results and interacts with the page.

Applet in question: https://github.com/JaggedJax/CIO_Scale

回答1:

Removing the Trusted-Library attribute seems to be mandatory to get Caller-Allowable-Codebase working, no more warnings. However, this breaks Java 7 Update 21 - 40 which treated JavaScript code that calls code within a signed applet running with all permissions as mixed code and warning dialogs are raised if the signed JAR files are not tagged with the Trusted-Library=true attribute.

回答2:

My findings are the same:

This prevents warnings with Java 7u21 - 7u40:

Manifest-Version: 1.0
Trusted-Library: true

This exclusivly prevents warnings with Java 7u45:

Manifest-Version: 1.0
Application-Library-Allowable-Codebase: *
Caller-Allowable-Codebase: *

Mixing both won't work in 7u45.

Now what? Did anyone find a way to allow SIGNED applets with "all-permissions" to run without warnings in both JRE-versions?

What the hell is wrong with oracle?

回答3:

This will be fixed in a future release, according to the oracle blog post:

https://blogs.oracle.com/java-platform-group/entry/7u45_caller_allowable_codebase_and

They recognize the error "Both of these attributes should work together to support the various versions of client installations". But for now, their solution is: "The current work-around would be to favor using Caller-Allowable-Codebase over the old Trusted-Library call. "

回答4:

I had the same issue. Solution for me was using same parameters in manifest as Oracle used on donwload page in applet for verify java version http://www.java.com/en/download/installed.jsp Their applet does not popup any warnings.

so solution is:

Manifest-Version: 1.0
Codebase: *
Permissions: all-permissions
Application-Library-Allowable-Codebase: *
Caller-Allowable-Codebase: *
Application-Name: APPNAME

it works on:
1.7.0_17-b02
1.7.0_25-b17
1.7.0_45-b18

回答5:

from oracle:

Area: Deployment/Plugin Synopsis: Caller-Allowable-Codebase may be ignored when used with Trusted-Library.

If a trusted, signed jar is using the Caller-Allowable-Codebase manifest attribute along with Trusted-Library then the Caller-Allowable-Codebase manifest entry will be ignored and, as a result, a JavaScript -> Java call will show the native LiveConnect warning. The workaround is to remove the Trusted-Library manifest entry.

http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/7u45-relnotes-2016950.html

回答6:

The only solution that I can think of that works with 7u45 and the Trusted-Library versions (7u21, 7u25 and 7u40) is to create two different JARs with different manifests and then detecting the user's version and loading the right one.

The main version served to versions before 7u21 and 7u45 and up will have the new Caller-Allowable-Codebase and no Trusted-Library entry. The second version produced will have Trusted-Library and will be served only to 7u21, 7u25 and 7u40.

Here is an ant macro to create the new jar with the modified manifest:

<macrodef name="addtrustedlibrarytojar">
    <attribute name="jarpath" />
    <attribute name="newjarpath" />
    <sequential>
        <echo>Unzipping @{jarpath} to add Trusted-Library</echo>
        <mkdir dir="build/temp_trusted_library" />
        <unjar src="@{jarpath}" dest="build/temp_trusted_library" />

        <echo>Inserting Trusted-Library in manifest</echo>
        <replaceregexp match="^" replace="Trusted-Library: true${line.separator}" flags="s">
            <fileset dir="build/temp_trusted_library/META-INF" includes="MANIFEST.MF"/>
        </replaceregexp>

        <echo>Creating @{newjarpath}</echo>
        <zip file="@{newjarpath}" basedir="build/temp_trusted_library" />

        <echo>Deleting build/temp_trusted_library directory</echo>
        <delete dir="build/temp_trusted_library" />
    </sequential>
</macrodef>

Call the macro like this for each JAR that needs the change made:

    <addtrustedlibrarytojar jarpath="dist/myapplet.jar" newjarpath="dist/myapplet_tl.jar" />

Remember to sign the new JAR. If it was signed already this change will invalidate the signature.

We use the PluginDetect library to detect the version of Java. Just extract PluginDetect_Java_Simple.js and getJavaInfo.jar. This code will get the java version:

<script type="text/javascript" src="js/PluginDetect_Java_Simple.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
var javaVersionDetected = '0';
function javaDetectionDone(pd) {
    javaVersionDetected = pd.getVersion("Java");
    if (console) console.info('Detected java version: ' + javaVersionDetected);
}
PluginDetect.onDetectionDone("Java", javaDetectionDone, "js/getJavaInfo.jar", null);
</script>

We use javascript to launch our applets so we use this to decide between the standard and trusted-library applets:

        if (javaVersionDetected === '1,7,0,21' || javaVersionDetected === '1,7,0,25' || javaVersionDetected === '1,7,0,40') {
            if (console) console.debug('Using TL applet');
            attribs['archive'] = 'applets/myapplet_tl.jar';
        }
        else {
            if (console) console.debug('Using normal applet');
            attribs['archive'] = 'applets/myapplet.jar';
        }

回答7:

I had the same issue, So I remove Trusted-Library=true from my MANIFEST.MF, work Caller-Allowable-Codebase attribute fine.

回答8:

For update 1.7.0_25 (and probably 21-40), setting the security settings to Medium in the Java Control Panel -> Security tab removes prompting when using the manifest tags for update 1.7.0_45.

回答9:

This set of attributes allows the applet to load without warnings in Java 7u45:

Application-Name: ...
Main-Class: com...
Sealed: true
Codebase: *
Caller-Allowable-Codebase: *
Permissions: all-permissions

We have tested on the following JVMs:

• Java 6u20 (OK, well duh!)
• Java 7u21 - must include Trusted-Library to avoid warning
• Java 7u25 - must include Trusted-Library to avoid warning
• Java 7u40 - must include Trusted-Library to avoid warning
• Java 7u45

So the long and short is we have a dilemma; to have no warning on 7u21, 7u25 and 7u40 you must include Trusted-Library:true, and to have no warning on 7u45 you must omit this property.

Thanks Oracle for a Kobayashi Maru - we love you.

回答10:

I'm finding now that some of my users still get this "mixed signed and unsigned code" warning (due to LiveConnect calls in the web page to the applet) even though I've set Caller-Allowable-Codebase correctly, and the difference between those that get it and those that don't get it is whether they have applet .jar file caching enabled in the client host. Those that allow Java to keep temporary files on the client (i.e., allow applet .jar files to be cached) get the warning, and those that turned caching off (because applet caching has never worked quite right) don't get the warning. Go figure.

回答11:

Without using Trusted-Library and setting:

Application-Library-Allowable-Codebase: *
Caller-Allowable-Codebase: *

Doesn't work for me, and i still see the warning.

Update: Tried also with http://... but didn't work either.

Update2: Seems even worse. I didnt update 7u40 (to 7u45) but Java console (full debug) shows the "LiveConnect 1.7.45" text. After that, my Javascript->Java calls are blocked.

Update 3: I noticed my warning shows Application and Publisher = UNKNOWN. Altought i have:

Application-Name: MyApplet
Implementation-Vendor: MyCompany

I tried using JDK7u45 instead of JDK7u5 i was using.

回答12:

To disable this "Security Warning" popup and other related popups using the Java 8 Update 45 JRE.

Trusted-Library: true
Caller-Allowable-Codebase: *.mycompany.com

Note: security warning popup was not disabled with wildcards * and *.com.

回答13:

We had this problem too - we were building with 1.4.2, on the theory that clients might not have an updated JRE plugin. Despite putting in the new manifest attributes, we still got the popup warnings in the 1.7_u45 JRE. We rebuilt with 1.6, and the warnings went away.

回答14:

EDIT: As it turns out, our app was doing something different if the file was in a different directory -- specifically, it wasn't attempting to access the applet signed jar manifests. So the fact that the file was in a different directory was irrelevant. So the below information is not accurate. I've decided to detail the real reason for the warning in a new question: As of Java 7 update 45, one can no longer lookup manifest information without triggering a warning?

Unfortunately, the workaround given by Oracle and others here for getting around the update 45 problem does NOT work if your app needs to access files in a different directory than where the app is being run from.

With my web start app, everything worked fine and dandy with the "Trusted-Library" attribute that needed to be added for 7u21. With 7u45, removing the "Trusted-Library" attribute and adding in all the additional attributes talked about in the other answers will NOT work -- I will get the same warning that you would get if you were running 7u21 without the Trusted-Library attribute (stating the application contains both signed and unsigned code).

It took me FOREVER to figure this out, because for very inexplicable reasons Oracle has decided not to print out ANY indication of what the "unsigned" code is in its console, even when running at maximum tracing (level 5). But basically, our app needs access to a configuration file which can be used by the user to configure application properties (for example, the logging level of our app). This configuration file is a plain old text file. And we store the config file in a directory co-located to where the app runs from: ..\config\app.properties. We access this file as a part of the main jar's init routine. It is here where the warning occurs.

The workaround here? Move app.properties into the same directory where the app is running from (and change the reference in the jar to just "app.properties"). Voila, it works -- no more warnings (as long as using the aforementioned codebase attributes). What the hell Oracle???

Unfortunately, because our app allows customized config files on a per-user basis, it is not as simple for us to just put the config file in the app's startup directory -- since that is NOT customized on a per-user basis, we would only be able to allow one user per machine to use the app simultaneously.

I've been looking over Java's manifest documentation to see if there is some way I can make the config file directory "safe" such that loading up of this file doesn't cause the warning. The only thing I can think of is either being able to use the Class-Path attribute or a combination of the Extension attributes (http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/plugin/developer_guide/extensions.html), however these all seem designed around the purpose of jars, not just regular files...

Any ideas? And since Oracle intends to fix the Trusted-Library issue anyway, is coming up with a (potentially) grandiose workaround-solution around this even worth the effort? Grrr....

回答15:

I found some strange thing with MANIFEST.MF file in scope of last Java security issue with new attribute "Caller-Allowable-Codebase". I had some issues, why this new attribute wasn't helpful for me and started investigation
(Attention!: it may be related only to my local computer configuration - because I had never seen such troubles over stackoverlow).

Manifest file had been upgraded according to new security feature:

Manifest-Version: 1.0
Application-Library-Allowable-Codebase: *
Caller-Allowable-Codebase: *

and *.jar was build, but without signing.

So, then I unpacked my *.jar file and looked in folder META-INF in MANIFEST.MF, where source manifest.mf should be generated.

And I was embarrassed by absence of last line, it looked this:

Manifest-Version: 1.0
Application-Library-Allowable-Codebase: *

I tested this behavior several times and found out, that last line always was exchanged to the whitespace. So, if it will be helpfull for someone, just append in the end of MANIFEST.MF file some unmeaningful attribute, like Codebase: *, which will be cutted during *.jar build.

回答16:

if you make a Manifest patch file remember to live an empty line in the end, otherwise it won´t work. For example you can make a patch like:

Permissions: all-permissions
Codebase: *
Application-Library-Allowable-Codebase: *
Caller-Allowable-Codebase: *

But you need to add an empty line (in the example 5 lines instead of four!)

And then add it to the manifest:

jar uvfm jarName.jar permissions.txt

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19393826/java-applet-manifest-allow-all-caller-allowable-codebase