Why doesn't list have safe “get” method like dictionary?

问题

Why doesn\'t list have a safe \"get\" method like dictionary?

>>> d = {\'a\':\'b\'}
>>> d[\'a\']
\'b\'
>>> d[\'c\']
KeyError: \'c\'
>>> d.get(\'c\', \'fail\')
\'fail\'

>>> l = [1]
>>> l[10]
IndexError: list index out of range

回答1:

Ultimately it probably doesn't have a safe .get method because a dict is an associative collection (values are associated with names) where it is inefficient to check if a key is present (and return its value) without throwing an exception, while it is super trivial to avoid exceptions accessing list elements (as the len method is very fast). The .get method allows you to query the value associated with a name, not directly access the 37th item in the dictionary (which would be more like what you're asking of your list).

Of course, you can easily implement this yourself:

def safe_list_get (l, idx, default):
  try:
    return l[idx]
  except IndexError:
    return default

You could even monkeypatch it onto the __builtins__.list constructor in __main__, but that would be a less pervasive change since most code doesn't use it. If you just wanted to use this with lists created by your own code you could simply subclass list and add the get method.

回答2:

This works if you want the first element, like my_list.get(0)

>>> my_list = [1,2,3]
>>> next(iter(my_list), 'fail')
1
>>> my_list = []
>>> next(iter(my_list), 'fail')
'fail'

I know it's not exactly what you asked for but it might help others.

回答3:

Instead of using .get, using like this should be ok for lists. Just a usage difference.

>>> l = [1]
>>> l[10] if 10 < len(l) else 'fail'
'fail'

回答4:

Probably because it just didn't make much sense for list semantics. However, you can easily create your own by subclassing.

class safelist(list):
    def get(self, index, default=None):
        try:
            return self.__getitem__(index)
        except IndexError:
            return default

def _test():
    l = safelist(range(10))
    print l.get(20, "oops")

if __name__ == "__main__":
    _test()

回答5:

Try this:

>>> i = 3
>>> a = [1, 2, 3, 4]
>>> next(iter(a[i:]), 'fail')
4
>>> next(iter(a[i + 1:]), 'fail')
'fail'

回答6:

The best thing you can do is to convert the list into a dict and then access it with the get method:

>>> my_list = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e']
>>> my_dict = dict(enumerate(my_list))
>>> print my_dict
{0: 'a', 1: 'b', 2: 'c', 3: 'd', 4: 'e'}
>>> my_dict.get(2)
'c'
>>> my_dict.get(10, 'N/A')

回答7:

Credits to jose.angel.jimenez

---

For the "oneliner" fans…

---

If you want the first element of a list or if you want a default value if the list is empty try:

liste = ['a', 'b', 'c']
value = (liste[0:1] or ('default',))[0]
print(value)

returns a

and

liste = []
value = (liste[0:1] or ('default',))[0]
print(value)

returns default

---

Examples for other elements…

liste = ['a', 'b', 'c']
print(liste[0:1])  # returns ['a']
print(liste[1:2])  # returns ['b']
print(liste[2:3])  # returns ['c']

With default fallback…

liste = ['a', 'b', 'c']
print((liste[0:1] or ('default',))[0])  # returns a
print((liste[1:2] or ('default',))[0])  # returns b
print((liste[2:3] or ('default',))[0])  # returns c

---

Tested with Python 3.6.0 (v3.6.0:41df79263a11, Dec 22 2016, 17:23:13)

回答8:

So I did some more research into this and it turns out there isn't anything specific for this. I got excited when I found list.index(value), it returns the index of a specified item, but there isn't anything for getting the value at a specific index. So if you don't want to use the safe_list_get solution which I think is pretty good. Here are some 1 liner if statements that can get the job done for you depending on the scenario:

>>> x = [1, 2, 3]
>>> el = x[4] if len(x) == 4 else 'No'
>>> el
'No'

You can also use None instead of 'No', which makes more sense.:

>>> x = [1, 2, 3]
>>> i = 2
>>> el_i = x[i] if len(x) == i+1 else None

Also if you want to just get the first or last item in the list, this works

end_el = x[-1] if x else None

You can also make these into functions but I still liked the IndexError exception solution. I experimented with a dummied down version of the safe_list_get solution and made it a bit simpler (no default):

def list_get(l, i):
    try:
        return l[i]
    except IndexError:
        return None

Haven't benchmarked to see what is fastest.

回答9:

Dictionaries are for look ups. It makes sense to ask if an entry exists or not. Lists are usually iterated. It isn't common to ask if L[10] exists but rather if the length of L is 11.

回答10:

Your usecase is basically only relevant for when doing arrays and matrixes of a fixed length, so that you know how long they are before hand. In that case you typically also create them before hand filling them up with None or 0, so that in fact any index you will use already exists.

You could say this: I need .get() on dictionaries quite often. After ten years as a full time programmer I don't think I have ever needed it on a list. :)

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5125619/why-doesnt-list-have-safe-get-method-like-dictionary