Delegation: EventEmitter or Observable in Angular

问题

I am trying to implement something like a delegation pattern in Angular. When the user clicks on a nav-item, I would like to call a function which then emits an event which should in turn be handled by some other component listening for the event.

Here is the scenario: I have a Navigation component:

import {Component, Output, EventEmitter} from \'angular2/core\';

@Component({
    // other properties left out for brevity
    events : [\'navchange\'], 
    template:`
      <div class=\"nav-item\" (click)=\"selectedNavItem(1)\"></div>
    `
})

export class Navigation {

    @Output() navchange: EventEmitter<number> = new EventEmitter();

    selectedNavItem(item: number) {
        console.log(\'selected nav item \' + item);
        this.navchange.emit(item)
    }

}

Here is the observing component:

export class ObservingComponent {

  // How do I observe the event ? 
  // <----------Observe/Register Event ?-------->

  public selectedNavItem(item: number) {
    console.log(\'item index changed!\');
  }

}

The key question is, how do I make the observing component observe the event in question ?

回答1:

Update 2016-06-27: instead of using Observables, use either

a BehaviorSubject, as recommended by @Abdulrahman in a comment, or
a ReplaySubject, as recommended by @Jason Goemaat in a comment

A Subject is both an Observable (so we can subscribe() to it) and an Observer (so we can call next() on it to emit a new value). We exploit this feature. A Subject allows values to be multicast to many Observers. We don't exploit this feature (we only have one Observer).

BehaviorSubject is a variant of Subject. It has the notion of "the current value". We exploit this: whenever we create an ObservingComponent, it gets the current navigation item value from the BehaviorSubject automatically.

The code below and the plunker use BehaviorSubject.

ReplaySubject is another variant of Subject. If you want to wait until a value is actually produced, use ReplaySubject(1). Whereas a BehaviorSubject requires an initial value (which will be provided immediately), ReplaySubject does not. ReplaySubject will always provide the most recent value, but since it does not have a required initial value, the service can do some async operation before returning it's first value. It will still fire immediately on subsequent calls with the most recent value. If you just want one value, use first() on the subscription. You do not have to unsubscribe if you use first().

import {Injectable}      from '@angular/core'
import {BehaviorSubject} from 'rxjs/BehaviorSubject';

@Injectable()
export class NavService {
  // Observable navItem source
  private _navItemSource = new BehaviorSubject<number>(0);
  // Observable navItem stream
  navItem$ = this._navItemSource.asObservable();
  // service command
  changeNav(number) {
    this._navItemSource.next(number);
  }
}

import {Component}    from '@angular/core';
import {NavService}   from './nav.service';
import {Subscription} from 'rxjs/Subscription';

@Component({
  selector: 'obs-comp',
  template: `obs component, item: {{item}}`
})
export class ObservingComponent {
  item: number;
  subscription:Subscription;
  constructor(private _navService:NavService) {}
  ngOnInit() {
    this.subscription = this._navService.navItem$
       .subscribe(item => this.item = item)
  }
  ngOnDestroy() {
    // prevent memory leak when component is destroyed
    this.subscription.unsubscribe();
  }
}

@Component({
  selector: 'my-nav',
  template:`
    <div class="nav-item" (click)="selectedNavItem(1)">nav 1 (click me)</div>
    <div class="nav-item" (click)="selectedNavItem(2)">nav 2 (click me)</div>`
})
export class Navigation {
  item = 1;
  constructor(private _navService:NavService) {}
  selectedNavItem(item: number) {
    console.log('selected nav item ' + item);
    this._navService.changeNav(item);
  }
}

Plunker

Original answer that uses an Observable: (it requires more code and logic than using a BehaviorSubject, so I don't recommend it, but it may be instructive)

So, here's an implementation that uses an Observable instead of an EventEmitter. Unlike my EventEmitter implementation, this implementation also stores the currently selected navItem in the service, so that when an observing component is created, it can retrieve the current value via API call navItem(), and then be notified of changes via the navChange$ Observable.

import {Observable} from 'rxjs/Observable';
import 'rxjs/add/operator/share';
import {Observer} from 'rxjs/Observer';

export class NavService {
  private _navItem = 0;
  navChange$: Observable<number>;
  private _observer: Observer;
  constructor() {
    this.navChange$ = new Observable(observer =>
      this._observer = observer).share();
    // share() allows multiple subscribers
  }
  changeNav(number) {
    this._navItem = number;
    this._observer.next(number);
  }
  navItem() {
    return this._navItem;
  }
}

@Component({
  selector: 'obs-comp',
  template: `obs component, item: {{item}}`
})
export class ObservingComponent {
  item: number;
  subscription: any;
  constructor(private _navService:NavService) {}
  ngOnInit() {
    this.item = this._navService.navItem();
    this.subscription = this._navService.navChange$.subscribe(
      item => this.selectedNavItem(item));
  }
  selectedNavItem(item: number) {
    this.item = item;
  }
  ngOnDestroy() {
    this.subscription.unsubscribe();
  }
}

@Component({
  selector: 'my-nav',
  template:`
    <div class="nav-item" (click)="selectedNavItem(1)">nav 1 (click me)</div>
    <div class="nav-item" (click)="selectedNavItem(2)">nav 2 (click me)</div>
  `,
})
export class Navigation {
  item:number;
  constructor(private _navService:NavService) {}
  selectedNavItem(item: number) {
    console.log('selected nav item ' + item);
    this._navService.changeNav(item);
  }
}

Plunker

See also the Component Interaction Cookbook example, which uses a Subject in addition to observables. Although the example is "parent and children communication," the same technique is applicable for unrelated components.

回答2:

Breaking news: I've added another answer that uses an Observable rather than an EventEmitter. I recommend that answer over this one. And actually, using an EventEmitter in a service is bad practice.

Original answer: (don't do this)

~~Put the EventEmitter into a service, which allows the ObservingComponent to directly subscribe (and unsubscribe) to the event~~:

import {EventEmitter} from 'angular2/core';

export class NavService {
  navchange: EventEmitter<number> = new EventEmitter();
  constructor() {}
  emit(number) {
    this.navchange.emit(number);
  }
  subscribe(component, callback) {
    // set 'this' to component when callback is called
    return this.navchange.subscribe(data => call.callback(component, data));
  }
}

@Component({
  selector: 'obs-comp',
  template: 'obs component, index: {{index}}'
})
export class ObservingComponent {
  item: number;
  subscription: any;
  constructor(private navService:NavService) {
   this.subscription = this.navService.subscribe(this, this.selectedNavItem);
  }
  selectedNavItem(item: number) {
    console.log('item index changed!', item);
    this.item = item;
  }
  ngOnDestroy() {
    this.subscription.unsubscribe();
  }
}

@Component({
  selector: 'my-nav',
  template:`
    <div class="nav-item" (click)="selectedNavItem(1)">item 1 (click me)</div>
  `,
})
export class Navigation {
  constructor(private navService:NavService) {}
  selectedNavItem(item: number) {
    console.log('selected nav item ' + item);
    this.navService.emit(item);
  }
}

If you try the Plunker, there are a few things I don't like about this approach:

ObservingComponent needs to unsubscribe when it is destroyed
we have to pass the component to subscribe() so that the proper this is set when the callback is called

Update: An alternative that solves the 2nd bullet is to have the ObservingComponent directly subscribe to the navchange EventEmitter property:

constructor(private navService:NavService) {
   this.subscription = this.navService.navchange.subscribe(data =>
     this.selectedNavItem(data));
}

If we subscribe directly, then we wouldn't need the subscribe() method on the NavService.

To make the NavService slightly more encapsulated, you could add a getNavChangeEmitter() method and use that:

getNavChangeEmitter() { return this.navchange; }  // in NavService

constructor(private navService:NavService) {  // in ObservingComponent
   this.subscription = this.navService.getNavChangeEmitter().subscribe(data =>
     this.selectedNavItem(data));
}

回答3:

If one wants to follow a more Reactive oriented style of programming, then definitely the concept of "Everything is a stream" comes into picture and hence, use Observables to deal with these streams as often as possible.

回答4:

you can use BehaviourSubject as described above or there is one more way:

you can handle EventEmitter like this: first add a selector

import {Component, Output, EventEmitter} from 'angular2/core';

@Component({
// other properties left out for brevity
selector: 'app-nav-component', //declaring selector
template:`
  <div class="nav-item" (click)="selectedNavItem(1)"></div>
`
 })

 export class Navigation {

@Output() navchange: EventEmitter<number> = new EventEmitter();

selectedNavItem(item: number) {
    console.log('selected nav item ' + item);
    this.navchange.emit(item)
}

}

Now you can handle this event like let us suppose observer.component.html is the view of Observer component

<app-nav-component (navchange)="recieveIdFromNav($event)"></app-nav-component>

then in the ObservingComponent.ts

export class ObservingComponent {

 //method to recieve the value from nav component

 public recieveIdFromNav(id: number) {
   console.log('here is the id sent from nav component ', id);
 }

 }

回答5:

You can use either:

Behaviour Subject:

BehaviorSubject is a type of subject, a subject is a special type of observable which can act as observable and observer you can subscribe to messages like any other observable and upon subscription, it returns the last value of the subject emitted by the source observable:

Advantage: No Relationship such as parent-child relationship required to pass data between components.

NAV SERVICE

import {Injectable}      from '@angular/core'
import {BehaviorSubject} from 'rxjs/BehaviorSubject';

@Injectable()
export class NavService {
  private navSubject$ = new BehaviorSubject<number>(0);

  constructor() {  }

  // Event New Item Clicked
  navItemClicked(navItem: number) {
    this.navSubject$.next(number);
  }

 // Allowing Observer component to subscribe emitted data only
  getNavItemClicked$() {
   return this.navSubject$.asObservable();
  }
}

NAVIGATION COMPONENT

@Component({
  selector: 'navbar-list',
  template:`
    <ul>
      <li><a (click)="navItemClicked(1)">Item-1 Clicked</a></li>
      <li><a (click)="navItemClicked(2)">Item-2 Clicked</a></li>
      <li><a (click)="navItemClicked(3)">Item-3 Clicked</a></li>
      <li><a (click)="navItemClicked(4)">Item-4 Clicked</a></li>
    </ul>
})
export class Navigation {
  constructor(private navService:NavService) {}
  navItemClicked(item: number) {
    this.navService.navItemClicked(item);
  }
}

OBSERVING COMPONENT

@Component({
  selector: 'obs-comp',
  template: `obs component, item: {{item}}`
})
export class ObservingComponent {
  item: number;
  itemClickedSubcription:any

  constructor(private navService:NavService) {}
  ngOnInit() {

    this.itemClickedSubcription = this.navService
                                      .getNavItemClicked$
                                      .subscribe(
                                        item => this.selectedNavItem(item)
                                       );
  }
  selectedNavItem(item: number) {
    this.item = item;
  }

  ngOnDestroy() {
    this.itemClickedSubcription.unsubscribe();
  }
}

Second Approach is Event Delegation in upward direction child -> parent

Using @Input and @Output decorators parent passing data to child component and child notifying parent component

e.g Answered given by @Ashish Sharma.

回答6:

You need to use the Navigation component in the template of ObservingComponent ( dont't forget to add a selector to Navigation component .. navigation-component for ex )

<navigation-component (navchange)='onNavGhange($event)'></navigation-component>

And implement onNavGhange() in ObservingComponent

onNavGhange(event) {
  console.log(event);
}

Last thing .. you don't need the events attribute in @Componennt

events : ['navchange'],

回答7:

I found out another solution for this case without using Reactivex neither services. I actually love the rxjx API however I think it goes best when resolving an async and/or complex function. Using It in that way, Its pretty exceeded to me.

What I think you are looking for is for a broadcast. Just that. And I found out this solution:

<app>
  <app-nav (selectedTab)="onSelectedTab($event)"></app-nav>
       // This component bellow wants to know when a tab is selected
       // broadcast here is a property of app component
  <app-interested [broadcast]="broadcast"></app-interested>
</app>

 @Component class App {
   broadcast: EventEmitter<tab>;

   constructor() {
     this.broadcast = new EventEmitter<tab>();
   }

   onSelectedTab(tab) {
     this.broadcast.emit(tab)
   }    
 }

 @Component class AppInterestedComponent implements OnInit {
   broadcast: EventEmitter<Tab>();

   doSomethingWhenTab(tab){ 
      ...
    }     

   ngOnInit() {
     this.broadcast.subscribe((tab) => this.doSomethingWhenTab(tab))
   }
 }

This is a full working example: https://plnkr.co/edit/xGVuFBOpk2GP0pRBImsE

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/34376854/delegation-eventemitter-or-observable-in-angular

标签

angular

observer-pattern

observable

eventemitter

event-delegation