问题
I have below setup of classes.
class Base {
@Autowired
private BaseService service; //No getters & setters
....
}
@Component
class Child extends Base {
private final SomeOtherService otherService;
@Autowired
Child(SomeOtherService otherService) {
this.otherService = otherService;
}
}
I am writing a unit test for the Child
class.
If I use @InjectMocks
then the otherService
comes out to be null. If I use, the constructor of Child
class in the setup of the test, then the fields in Base
class comes out to be null
.
I know all the arguments about field injection being evil, but I am more interested in knowing if there is a way to solve this without changing the way Base
and Child
classes injects their properties?
Thanks!!
回答1:
Just do this:
public class Test {
// Create a mock early on, so we can use it for the constructor:
OtherService otherService = Mockito.mock(OtherService.class);
// A mock for base service, mockito can create this:
@Mock BaseService baseService;
// Create the Child class ourselves with the mock, and
// the combination of @InjectMocks and @Spy tells mockito to
// inject the result, but not create it itself.
@InjectMocks @Spy Child child = new Child(otherService);
@Before
public void before() {
MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this);
}
}
Mockito should do the right thing.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43045357/spring-unit-test-for-class-that-has-both-field-constructor-injection