问题
In the following code
var a int
var b interface{}
b = a
fmt.Printf("%T, %T \n", a, &a)
fmt.Printf("%T, %T \n", b, &b)
output:
int, *int
int, *interface {}
I would expect the type of &b to be a pointer on int.
I have two questions:
1) Why is it a pointer on interface{} ?
2) How could I get a pointer on the original type ?
回答1:
&b
=> this is the address operator applied on the variable b
, whose type is interface{}
. So &b
will be a pointer of type *interface{}
, pointing to the variable b
. If you take the address of a variable of type T
, the result will always be of type *T
.
You cannot obtain the address of the variable a
from b
, because the assignment:
b = a
Simply copies the value of a
into b
. It wraps the value of a
in an interface value of type interface{}
, and stores this interface value into b
. This value is completely detached from a
.
In general, all assignments copy the values being assigned. There are no reference types in Go. The closest you can get to what you want is if you store the address of a
in b
in the first place, e.g.:
b = &a
Then you can use type assertion to get out a
's address from b
like this:
fmt.Printf("%T, %T \n", a, &a)
fmt.Printf("%T, %T \n", b, b.(*int))
This outputs (try it on the Go Playground):
int, *int
*int, *int
(Note: when you simply print b
, since it is of an interface type, the fmt
package prints the (concrete) value wrapped in it.)
See related questions:
How to get a pointer to a variable that's masked as an interface?
Changing pointer type and value under interface with reflection
回答2:
Just to complete icza's answer. In case if you don't know the type of the value stored in the interface (and, hence, you can't explicitly use type assertion), you can use reflect package:
var a int
var b interface{}
b = &a
fmt.Println(reflect.TypeOf(b))
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54592868/get-pointer-on-var-obtained-via-interface