问题
I have written a Linux Loadable Kernel Module which attempts to attach to the FIQ to service GPIO edge transistions. The Pin in question is on GPIO0 (IRQ 49) so I attempt to configure the FIQ as follows:
#ifndef GPIO_BASE
#define GPIO_BASE 0x7E200000
#endif
#define GPIO_LEN 0x60
#define GPIO_GPEDS0 0x10
#define GPIO_GPEDS1 0x11
#define GPIO_GPREN0 0x13
#define GPIO_GPREN1 0x14
#define GPIO_GPFEN0 0x16
#define GPIO_GPFEN1 0x17
#define AIR_BASE 0x7E00B200
#define AIR_LEN 0x28
#define AIR_IP2 2 // IRQ pending source 63:32
#define AIR_FIQ 3 // FIQ Config register
#define AIR_FIQ_AN 0x80L // FIQ enable field mask
#define AIR_FIQ_SRC 0x7FL // FIQ Source field mask
#define AIR_EN2 5 // IRQ Enable IRQ source 63:32
#define AIR_DE2 8 // IRQ Disable IRQ source 63:32
#define AIR_GPIO0_IRQ 49
struct {
uint32_t wr_p;
} fiq_data_s;
extern unsigned char pulse_logger_fiq_handler, pulse_logger_fiq_handler_end;
static struct fiq_handler pulse_logger_fh = {
.name = "pulse_logger_fiq_handler"
};
static int __init pulse_logger_init(void)
{
gpioReg = ioremap(GPIO_BASE, GPIO_LEN);
aircReg = ioremap(AIR_BASE, AIR_LEN);
fiq_data_s.wr_p = (uint32_t)&wr_p; // Log offset to store system counter
printk(KERN_INFO "Enabling FIQ...\n");
printk(KERN_INFO "\tdisable GPIO0 IRQ\n");
// Disable IRQ tied to FIQ
disable_irq_nosync(AIR_GPIO0_IRQ);
printk(KERN_INFO "\tConfig GPIO Edge Events\n");
writel(AIR_GPIO0_MSK, gpioReg + GPIO_GPEDS0);
gpren0 = readl((const volatile void *)(gpioReg + GPIO_GPREN0));
gpren0 |= AIR_GPIO0_MSK;
writel(gpren0, gpioReg + GPIO_GPREN0);
gpfen0 = readl((const volatile void *)(gpioReg + GPIO_GPFEN0));
gpfen0 |= AIR_GPIO0_MSK;
writel(gpfen0, gpioReg + GPIO_GPFEN0);
printk(KERN_INFO "\tClaim FIQ\n");
// Reserve the FIQ
ret = claim_fiq(&pulse_logger_fh);
if (ret){
printk(KERN_INFO "Failed to claim FIQ (%d)!\n", ret);
goto fail1;
}
// Copy FIQ to vector location
printk(KERN_INFO "\tcopying handler\n");
set_fiq_handler(&pulse_logger_fiq_handler,
&pulse_logger_fiq_handler_end - &pulse_logger_fiq_handler);
// Store symbol pointers in FIQ registers
printk(KERN_INFO "\tstoring registers\n");
memset(®s,0, sizeof(regs));
regs.ARM_r8 = (long)&fiq_data_s;
set_fiq_regs(®s);
printk(KERN_INFO "\tEnable FIQ\n");
// Enable the FIQ
enable_fiq(AIR_GPIO0_IRQ);
local_fiq_enable();
return 0;
}
I then find that the FIQ register has an invalid entry of 0x54 so I force the FIQ register:
writel(0x80 | AIR_GPIO0_IRQ, (volatile void *)(aircReg + AIR_FIQ));
I have written the FIQ as follows:
#define DATA_ACK_OFFSET 12
ENTRY(pulse_logger_fiq_handler)
/* Acknowledge the interrupt */
/* Write PIN_ACK to the EVENT_STATUS_OFFSET register */
LDR R14, [R8, #DATA_ACK_OFFSET] /* Load Address */
MOV R12, #PIN_ACK
STR R12, [R14, #0]
LDR R14, [R8, #0] /* Load Address */
LDR R14, [R14, #0] /* Load Value */
ADD R14, R14, #1
LDR R12, [R8, #0] /* Load Address */
STR R14, [R12, #0]
/* return from fiq */
subs pc, lr, #4
pulse_logger_fiq_handler_end:
I then toggle the line 20 times (using another GPIO) but at the end of the run wr_p == 1
.
If I run the code as a standard ISR wr_p == 20
, leaving me to believe that the ISR code is valid, I just need to understand why the FIQ only appears to be firing once.
static irqreturn_t pulse_isr(int irq, void *data)
{
uint32_t fiq_data_addr = (uint32_t)&fiq_data_s;
*((uint32_t*)*((uint32_t*)fiq_data_addr)) += 1;
__asm__ __volatile__ (
"MOV R8, %[fiqbase] \n"
"LDR R14, [R8, #12] \n\t" /* Load Address */
"MOV R12, #0x00000010 \n\t"
"STR R12, [R14, #0] \n\t"
"LDR R14, [R8, #0] \n\t"/* Load Address */
"LDR R14, [R14, #0] \n\t"/* Load Value */
"ADD R14, R14, #1 \n\t"
"LDR R12, [R8, #0] \n\t" /* Load Address */
"STR R14, [R12, #0] \n\t"
:: [fiqbase] "r" (fiq_data_addr)
: "r8", "r12", "r14");
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
If I dig in to [local_]enable_fiq()
it doesn't look like it touches the hardware at all which is why I think I have to write the register but, I don't see this happening in other drivers that I have looked at online so I'm confused.
Is there a reason why this would only be triggering once (even if I don't write the FIQ register)?
回答1:
I figured it out, r13-r14 are not actually general purpose registers. These are the SP and LR.
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.ddi0337h/Chdedegj.html
A rewrite to use r8-r12 has this working.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/32194264/bcm2708-rpi-rasbpian-fiq-not-triggered