问题
I defined the AT-POS
method for a class and exported the []
operator.
When I used []
on the instance of that class, however, the compiler ignored the operator defined by me.
Here is the code:
unit module somelib;
class SomeClass is export {
method AT-POS(@indices) {
say "indices are {@indices.perl}"
}
}
multi postcircumfix:<[ ]> (SomeClass:D $inst, *@indices) is export {
$inst.AT-POS(@indices)
}
#! /usr/bin/env perl6
use v6.c
use lib ".";
use somelib;
my $inst = SomeClass.new;
$inst[3, 'hi'];
# expected output:
# indices are 3, 'hi'
# actual output:
# Type check failed in binding to parameter '@indices';
# expected Positional but got Int (3)
# in method AT-POS at xxx/somelib.pm6 (somelib) line 4
# in block <unit> at ./client.pl6 line 8
So what is the problem with this code?
UPDATE:
I did need to pass more than one indices to the AT-POS method And I was quite surprised to find that using *$indices rather than *@indices gave the expected output when I was fixing a typo. I don't know there exists such usage like *$some-parameter. Is it valid or just a bug of the compiler?
unit module somelib;
class SomeClass is export {
method AT-POS($indices) {
say "indices are {$indices.perl}"
}
}
multi postcircumfix:<[ ]> (SomeClass:D $inst, *$indices) is export {
$inst.AT-POS($indices)
}
#! /usr/bin/env perl6
use v6.c;
use lib ".";
use somelib;
my $inst = SomeClass.new;
$inst[3, 'hi'];
# expected output:
# indices are 3, 'hi' # or something like it
# actual output:
# indices are $(3, "hi") # It's ok for me.
回答1:
The problem is that AT-POS
is only expected to receive a single argument for a 1-dimensional Positional
. If you specify a slice, then the setting will take care of calling AT-POS
multiple times and collect the results into a list:
class A {
method AT-POS($a) { 2 * $a }
}
dd A.new[1,2,3,4]; # (2,4,6,8)
Also, you don't need to provide a postcircumfix:<[ ]>
candidate, unless you really want to do very special things: the setting provided one will dispatch to the right AT-POS
for you automagically.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54685935/how-to-define-the-at-pos-method