问题
I have two tables:
Book(BookID, Title, Author, Decision)
BookShipment(BookID, ShipmentID)
CREATE TABLE BookShipment(
BookID CHAR(4),
ShipmentID(7)
CONSTRAINT pk_BookShipment PRIMARY KEY (BookID, ShipmentID),
CONSTRAINT fk_BookShipment_Book FOREIGN KEY (BookID) REFERENCES Book(BookID));
The idea is that a Book needs to be "Approved" before it's added to a Shipment. If it's "Rejected" it won't be added.
Is there a way to add an additional constraint to BookShipment
that, when a new BookID
is added, would check that Decision
under the Book
table is equal to Approved
(for that BookID
)?
回答1:
If you'll always have a single status to check, this can be done with little tricks on FK constraint:
- Create dummy unuque index on
Books(BookId, Decision)
. - Add calculated column to
BookShipment
with valueApproved
. - Reference the created unique index in FK constraint.
Defining UDF in CHECK
constraint should be more flexible way for this.
create table book (
BookID int identity(1,1) primary key,
Title varchar(100),
Author varchar(100),
Decision varchar(100),
--Dummy constraint for FK
constraint u_book unique(bookid, decision)
);
CREATE TABLE BookShipment(
BookID int,
ShipmentID varchar(7),
--Dummy column for FK
approved as cast('Approved' as varchar(100)) persisted
CONSTRAINT pk_BookShipment PRIMARY KEY (BookID),
CONSTRAINT fk_BookShipment_Book_Approved
FOREIGN KEY (BookID, approved)
REFERENCES Book(BookID, decision)
);
insert into book (Title, Author, Decision)
select 'A', 'B', 'Approved' union all
select 'A', 'B', 'New'
;
--2 rows affected
insert into BookShipment values(1, 1);
--1 rows affected
insert into BookShipment values(2, 2);
/*
insert into BookShipment values(2, 2);
Msg 547 Level 16 State 0 Line 1
The INSERT statement conflicted with the FOREIGN KEY constraint "fk_BookShipment_Book_Approved". The conflict occurred in database "fiddle_ea408f09b06247a78b47ea9c353eda10", table "dbo.book".
Msg 3621 Level 0 State 0 Line 1
The statement has been terminated.
*/
db<>fiddle here
回答2:
If you have only a single thing to check, then astentex's answer will do you nicely. But if you have arbitrary constraints, especially spanning multiple tables, there is a different option which is more flexible.
It is based around a trick involving Indexed Views. I got this from an article by spaghettidba.
An indexed view is a view that is persisted to disk. We create it by creating a clustered index on the view. There are many limitations to it, crucially in our case that we can't use left/right/full join
, only inner
is allowed. It also must be schema-bound (you can't change the underlying columns), and must reference tables with two-part names.
Let us suppose that the opposite of your constraint is true: there are rows in BookShipment
for which the relevant Book
is not Approved
. How can we see such Books
in a view:
CREATE /* OR ALTER */ VIEW dbo.vwNonApprovedBooks
WITH SCHEMABINDING
AS
SELECT b.BookId
FROM dbo.BookShipment AS bs
JOIN dbo.Book AS b ON b.BookID = bs.BookID
WHERE b.Decision <> 'Approved';
GO
We could index this by creating a clustered index, DO NOT do this yet:
CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX CX_vwNonApprovedBooks ON dbo.vwNonApprovedBooks (BookId);
Now we will pull a little trick. If we want to stop any rows existing in this view, we need to force every inserted row to multiply out so that it fails the unique constraint.
Let us create a table for this:
CREATE TABLE dbo.DummyTwoRows (x bit NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY);
GO
INSERT dbo.DummyTwoRows VALUES (0),(1);
Now we can redefine the view like this:
CREATE /* OR ALTER */ VIEW dbo.vwNonApprovedBooks
WITH SCHEMABINDING
AS
SELECT 1 AS DummyOne
FROM dbo.BookShipment AS bs
JOIN dbo.Book AS b ON b.BookID = bs.BookID
CROSS JOIN dbo.DummyTwoRows
WHERE b.Decision <> 'Approved';
GO
CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX CX_vwNonApprovedBooks ON dbo.vwNonApprovedBooks (DummyOne);
And on any insert into BookShipment
with a Book
that is not Approved
, the unique constraint will fail.
SQL Server will maintain this view on inserts and updates, so that if a Book
is changed to not Approved
where it has BookShipment
, the constraint will fail the update also.
Note that this index takes up no space as there are never any rows in it.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65825778/adding-constraints-that-check-a-separate-linked-table-for-a-value