问题
I would like to have a template parameter specific function inside a class unsing enable_if. Its name stays the same, the parameter type varies (although this should not be relevant since only one is initialized).
enum class MyCases {
CASE1,
CASE2
};
template<enum MyCases case>
class MyClass
{
template<typename = typename std::enable_if<case == MyCases::CASE1>::type>
void myFunction(ParameterTypeA a) {
...
}
template<typename = typename std::enable_if<case == MyCases::CASE2>::type>
void myFunction(ParameterTypeB b) {
...
}
};
I get now an error saying that the compiler wanted to instantiate the first function with CASE2 and the second function with CASE1, although I thought that the substitution failure should not cause an error (SFINAE). What am I doing wrong? Thank you for any help!
error: no type named ‘type’ in ‘struct std::enable_if<false, void>’
回答1:
Here's a solution. Scroll down to see my thought process.
#include <type_traits>
#include <iostream>
struct ParameterTypeA {};
struct ParameterTypeB {};
enum class MyCases {
CASE1,
CASE2
};
template<enum MyCases U>
class MyClass
{
public:
MyClass() { }
~MyClass() { }
template<enum MyCases T = U>
void myFunction(ParameterTypeA a, typename std::enable_if<T == MyCases::CASE1, void>::type* = nullptr) {
std::cout << "A" << std::endl;
}
template<enum MyCases T = U>
void myFunction(ParameterTypeB b, typename std::enable_if<T == MyCases::CASE2, void>::type* = nullptr) {
std::cout << "B" << std::endl;
}
};
int main() {
MyClass<MyCases::CASE1> m1;
m1.myFunction(ParameterTypeA{});
MyClass<MyCases::CASE2> m2;
m2.myFunction(ParameterTypeB{});
return 0;
}
Output:
A
B
Live Example
Without adding template
before the member functions, you will get a error: no type named 'type' in 'struct std::enable_if<false, void>'
error or similar. For sanity, I boiled it down to this example:
#include <type_traits>
template <typename U>
class Test {
template <typename T = U>
void myFunction(int b, typename std::enable_if<std::is_same<int, T>::value, void>::type* = nullptr) {
}
template <typename T = U>
void myFunction(int b, typename std::enable_if<!std::is_same<int, T>::value, void>::type* = nullptr) {
}
};
int main() {
Test<int> test;
return 0;
}
After realizing this, I modified the first person's answer to get this. As you can see, there's no enum class
in this version, but if you change typename U
and typename T
to enum MyCases
, it works like magic.
#include <type_traits>
#include <iostream>
struct ParameterTypeA {};
struct ParameterTypeB {};
template<typename U>
class MyClass
{
public:
MyClass() { }
~MyClass() { }
template<typename T = U>
void myFunction(ParameterTypeA a, typename std::enable_if<std::is_same<ParameterTypeA, T>::value, void>::type* = nullptr) {
std::cout << "A" << std::endl;
}
template<typename T = U>
void myFunction(ParameterTypeB b, typename std::enable_if<std::is_same<ParameterTypeB, T>::value, void>::type* = nullptr) {
std::cout << "B" << std::endl;
}
};
int main() {
MyClass<ParameterTypeA> m1;
m1.myFunction(ParameterTypeA{});
MyClass<ParameterTypeB> m2;
m2.myFunction(ParameterTypeB{});
return 0;
}
Output:
A
B
Live Example
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/20289397/add-method-to-class-by-template-parameter