问题
I've been going around and around this and it's just not clear what to do.
I have a simple table where I want to make queries against several columns. As I understand it, that means creating a secondary index for each column there is to query against. I've defined the table -- using the Serverless framework serverless.yml
-- and am getting a variety of strange error messages.
The current serverless.yml
definition is:
resources:
Resources:
MessagesDynamoDBTable:
Type: 'AWS::DynamoDB::Table'
Properties:
AttributeDefinitions:
- AttributeName: messageId
AttributeType: S
- AttributeName: room
AttributeType: S
- AttributeName: userId
AttributeType: S
KeySchema:
- AttributeName: messageId
KeyType: HASH
- AttributeName: userId
KeyType: RANGE
LocalSecondaryIndexes:
- IndexName: roomIndex
KeySchema:
- AttributeName: room
KeyType: HASH
Projection:
ProjectionType: "KEYS_ONLY"
- IndexName: userId
KeySchema:
- AttributeName: userId
KeyType: HASH
Projection:
ProjectionType: "KEYS_ONLY"
ProvisionedThroughput:
ReadCapacityUnits: 1
WriteCapacityUnits: 1
TableName: ${self:custom.tableName}
It's meant to be something like a Slack service - and therefore I want to query for entries from a room, by a user, and so forth.
This definition makes sense going by the documentation I've been able to find. One is supposed to declare Attributes for the columns used in indexes, and I've done so. The KeySchema - I really only need the messageId field, but an error message indicated it needed a RANGE index, so I added the userId field to the KeySchema just to shut that up. The secondary index fields look right based on the documentation I've been able to find.
With this definition I'm getting this error when trying to deploy using serverless deploy
An error occurred: MessagesDynamoDBTable - Property AttributeDefinitions is inconsistent
with the KeySchema of the table and the secondary indexes.
I have tried several variations and gotten other strange errors as well. What follows is a few, but I don't remember what the corresponding changes were to the definition.
An error occurred: MessagesDynamoDBTable - One or more parameter values were invalid:
Index KeySchema does not have a range key for index: userId (Service: AmazonDynamoDBv2; Status Code: 400;
Error Code: ValidationException; Request ID: 1KFA2IMASC12HRLLDPG753CU63VV4KQNSO5AEMVJF66Q9ASUAAJG).
An error occurred: MessagesDynamoDBTable - 1 validation error detected: Value '[com.amazonaws.dynamodb.v20120810.KeySchemaElement@aa4cdc91,
com.amazonaws.dynamodb.v20120810.KeySchemaElement@d2cd6f64, com.amazonaws.dynamodb.v20120810.KeySchemaElement@4d7c1f9,
com.amazonaws.dynamodb.v20120810.KeySchemaElement@d2cd6f64]' at 'keySchema' failed to satisfy constraint: Member must have length less
than or equal to 2 (Service: AmazonDynamoDBv2; Status Code: 400; Error Code: ValidationException; Request ID: BOVVBQ1F35VA18CCF3L5MSKS1FVV4KQNSO5AEMVJF66Q9ASUAAJG).
An error occurred: MessagesDynamoDBTable - Property AttributeDefinitions is inconsistent with the KeySchema
of the table and the secondary indexes.
An error occurred: MessagesDynamoDBTable - One or more parameter values were invalid: Index KeySchema does not have a range key for index:
userIdIndex (Service: AmazonDynamoDBv2; Status Code: 400; Error Code: ValidationException; Request ID: KFS63VSPKDUC60DV6U2V47UP27VV4KQNSO5AEMVJF66Q9ASUAAJG).
An error occurred: MessagesDynamoDBTable - One or more parameter values were invalid: Table KeySchema does not have a range key,
which is required when specifying a LocalSecondaryIndex (Service: AmazonDynamoDBv2; Status Code: 400; Error Code: ValidationException; Request ID: 86Q2JSPM6Q9UPNIEOVHALLIIQJVV4KQNSO5AEMVJF66Q9ASUAAJG).
回答1:
The reason it isn't working is that the keys in a Local Secondary Index must have the same partition key as the table. So in your case, your Local Secondary Indexes must have messageId
as its HASH
key and room
and userId
as RANGE
keys on their respective indexes. And since your table is already keyed by (messageId, userId)
then you don't need the userId
Local Secondary Index.
This setup would technically work:
MessagesDynamoDBTable:
Type: AWS::DynamoDB::Table
Properties:
AttributeDefinitions:
- AttributeName: messageId
AttributeType: S
- AttributeName: room
AttributeType: S
- AttributeName: userId
AttributeType: S
KeySchema:
- AttributeName: messageId
KeyType: HASH
- AttributeName: userId
KeyType: RANGE
LocalSecondaryIndexes:
- IndexName: roomIndex
KeySchema:
- AttributeName: messageId
KeyType: HASH
- AttributeName: room
KeyType: RANGE
Projection:
ProjectionType: KEYS_ONLY
ProvisionedThroughput:
ReadCapacityUnits: 1
WriteCapacityUnits: 1
TableName: ${self:custom.tableName}
However if what you want to do is query by rooms and users, then you probably want to go with a different table design. What you are trying to do would end up requiring you to always query the table using the messageId
as part of the query since it is the partition key. So you wouldn't be able to query by just room
and userId
. What you probably want are Global Secondary Indexes. In that case, this would work:
MessagesDynamoDBTable:
Type: AWS::DynamoDB::Table
Properties:
AttributeDefinitions:
- AttributeName: messageId
AttributeType: S
- AttributeName: room
AttributeType: S
- AttributeName: userId
AttributeType: S
KeySchema:
- AttributeName: messageId
KeyType: HASH
GlobalSecondaryIndexes:
- IndexName: roomIndex
KeySchema:
- AttributeName: room
KeyType: HASH
Projection:
ProjectionType: KEYS_ONLY
ProvisionedThroughput:
ReadCapacityUnits: 1
WriteCapacityUnits: 1
- IndexName: userIndex
KeySchema:
- AttributeName: userId
KeyType: HASH
Projection:
ProjectionType: KEYS_ONLY
ProvisionedThroughput:
ReadCapacityUnits: 1
WriteCapacityUnits: 1
ProvisionedThroughput:
ReadCapacityUnits: 1
WriteCapacityUnits: 1
TableName: ${self:custom.tableName}
Note that making your ProjectionType: KEYS_ONLY
means when you query roomIndex
or userIndex
what you would get back is just messageIds
- you would then have to requery the table with the messageIds
to get other attributes. You might want to use a different ProjectionType
depending on what your usage pattern is.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50597791/dynamodb-queries-on-secondary-index-how-to-define-the-indexes