How can I get “grep -zoP” to display every match separately?

问题

I have a file on this form:

X/this is the first match/blabla
X-this is
the second match-

and here we have some fluff.

And I want to extract everything that appears after "X" and between the same markers. So if I have "X+match+", I want to get "match", because it appears after "X" and between the marker "+".

So for the given sample file I would like to have this output:

this is the first match

and then

this is
the second match

I managed to get all the content between X followed by a marker by using:

grep -zPo '(?<=X(.))(.|\n)+(?=\1)' file

That is:

• grep -Po '(?<=X(.))(.|\n)+(?=\1)' to match X followed by (something) that gets captured and matched at the end with (?=\1) (I based the code on my answer here).
• Note I use (.|\n) to match anything, including a new line, and that I also use -z in grep to match new lines as well.

So this works well, the only problem comes from the display of the output:

$ grep -zPo '(?<=X(.))(.|\n)+(?=\1)' file
this is the first matchthis is
the second match

As you can see, all the matches appear together, with "this is the first match" being followed by "this is the second match" with no separator at all. I know this comes from the usage of "-z", that treats all the file as a set of lines, each terminated by a zero byte (the ASCII NUL character) instead of a newline (quoting "man grep").

So: is there a way to get all these results separately?

I tried also in GNU Awk:

awk 'match($0, /X(.)(\n|.*)\1/, a) {print a[1]}' file

but not even the (\n|.*) worked.

回答1:

The use case is kind of problematic, because as soon as you print the matches, you lose the information about where exactly the separator was. But if that's acceptable, try piping to xargs -r0.

grep -zPo '(?<=X(.))(.|\n)+(?=\1)' file | xargs -r0

These options are GNU extensions, but then so is grep -z and (mostly) grep -P, so perhaps that's acceptable.

回答2:

awk doesn't support backreferences within regexp definition.

Workarounds:

$ grep -zPo '(?s)(?<=X(.)).+(?=\1)' ip.txt | tr '\0' '\n'
this is the first match
this is
the second match

# with ripgrep, which supports multiline matching
$ rg -NoUP '(?s)(?<=X(.)).+(?=\1)' ip.txt
this is the first match
this is
the second match

Can also use (?s)X(.)\K.+(?=\1) instead of (?s)(?<=X(.)).+(?=\1). Also, you might want to use non-greedy quantifier here to avoid matching match+xyz+foobaz for an input X+match+xyz+foobaz+

With perl

$ perl -0777 -nE 'say $& while(/X(.)\K.+(?=\1)/sg)' ip.txt
this is the first match
this is
the second match

回答3:

Here is another gnu-awk solution making use of RS and RT:

awk -v RS='X.' 'ch != "" && n=index($0, ch) {
   print substr($0, 1, n-1)
}
RT {
   ch = substr(RT, 2, 1)
}' file

this is the first match
this is
the second match

回答4:

With GNU awk for multi-char RS, RT, and gensub() and without having to read the whole file into memory:

$ awk -v RS='X.' 'NR>1{print "<" gensub(end".*","",1) ">"} {end=substr(RT,2,1)}' file
<this is the first match>
<this is
the second match>

Obviously I added the "<" and ">" so you could see where each output record starts/ends.

The above assumes that the character after X isn't a non-repetition regexp metachar (e.g. ., ^, [, etc.) so YMMV

回答5:

GNU grep -z terminates input/output records with null characters (useful in conjunction with other tools such as sort -z). pcregrep will not do that:

pcregrep -Mo2 '(?s)X(.)(.+?)\1' file

-onumber used instead of lookarounds. ? lazy quantifier added (in case \1 occurs later).

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64968569/how-can-i-get-grep-zop-to-display-every-match-separately