问题
From the Haskell wiki:
Monads can be viewed as a standard programming interface to various data or control structures, which is captured by the Monad class. All common monads are members of it:
class Monad m where (>>=) :: m a -> (a -> m b) -> m b (>>) :: m a -> m b -> m b return :: a -> m a fail :: String -> m a
In addition to implementing the class functions, all instances of Monad should obey the following equations, or Monad Laws:
return a >>= k = k a m >>= return = m m >>= (\x -> k x >>= h) = (m >>= k) >>= h
Question: Are the three monad laws at the bottom actually enforced in any way by the language? Or are they extra axioms that you must enforce in order for your language construct of a "Monad" to match the mathematical concept of a "Monad"?
回答1:
You are responsible for enforcing that a Monad
instance obeys the monad laws. Here's a simple example that doesn't.
Even though its type is compatible with the Monad
methods, counting the number of times the bind operator has been used isn't a Monad because it violates the law m >>= return = m
{-# Language DeriveFunctor #-}
import Control.Monad
data Count a = Count Int a
deriving (Functor, Show)
instance Applicative Count where
pure = return
(<*>) = ap
instance Monad Count where
return = Count 0
(Count c0 a) >>= k =
case k a of
Count c1 b -> Count (c0 + c1 + 1) b
回答2:
No, the monad laws are not enforced by the language. But if you don't adhere to them, your code may not necessarily behave as you'd expect in some situations. And it would certainly be confusing to users of your code.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37124471/are-monad-laws-enforced-in-haskell