问题
I will try to explain:
I have a table 'Product' and a table 'Store'. I'm trying to get just the store name to show at the page, but ActiveRecord is returning me all the columns from the store.
Here is the code:
@product = Product
.order(id: :desc)
.includes(:store)
.select("products.id, products.store_id, stores.name")
.limit(1)
The built query (from Rails):
Processing by IndexController#index as HTML
Product Load (0.0ms) SELECT products.id, products.store_id FROM `products` ORDER BY `products`.`id` DESC LIMIT 1
Store Load (1.0ms) SELECT `stores`.* FROM `stores` WHERE `stores`.`id` IN (111)
I just want to show the product's store name, but Rails is selecting all the store columns.
My models:
Product.rb
class Product < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :store, :foreign_key => 'store_id'
end
Store.rb:
class Loja < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :products
end
Any idea?
回答1:
You can do this via pluck and joins:
Product
.order(id: :desc)
.joins(:store)
.pluck("products.id, products.store_id, stores.name")
.limit(1)
You're going to get an array back that follows the order of the columns defined in pluck. I've written about pluck before if you're not familiar with it.
The other way is via a straight SQL query:
sql =<<-EOF
SELECT products.id, products.store_id, stores.name
FROM products INNER JOIN stores
ON products.store_id = stores.id
ORDER BY products.id DESC
LIMIT 1
EOF
records = ActiveRecord::Base.connection.execute(sql)
#=> [{"id" => X, "store_id" => Y, "name" => Z, ... }]
Both options produce the same SQL statement, the just vary in how the results come out.
回答2:
Just tried something similar to this on my project. This should work:
@products = Product.
.order(id: :desc)
.joins(:store)
.select("products.id, products.store_id, stores.name")
.limit(1)
Using joins
as opposed to includes
will make rails perform only one query, because joins
doesn't eager-load the association.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/32925554/rails-include-only-selected-columns-from-relation