问题
for example
(nestFind '(a(b)((c))d e f)) => 3
(nestFind '()) => 0
(nestFind '(a b)) => 1
(nestFind '((a)) )=> 2
(nestFind '(a (((b c d))) (e) ((f)) g)) => 4
this is what i tried so far but its not working properly:
(define (nestFind a)
(cond
((null? a)0)
((atom? a)0)
((atom? (car a))(+ 1 (nestFind (cdr a))))
(else
(+(nestFind (car a))(nestFind (cdr a))))))
回答1:
It's a bit simpler. Give this a try:
(define (nestFind lst)
(if (not (pair? lst))
0
(max (add1 (nestFind (car lst)))
(nestFind (cdr lst)))))
The trick is using max to find out which branch of the recursion is the deepest, noticing that each time we recur on the car
we add one more level. Alternatively, a solution closer to what you intended - but once again, max
proves helpful:
(define (nestFind lst)
(cond ((null? lst) 0)
((atom? lst) 0)
(else (max (+ 1 (nestFind (car lst)))
(nestFind (cdr lst))))))
Either way, it'll work as expected for the sample input:
(nestFind '())
=> 0
(nestFind '(a b))
=> 1
(nestFind '((a)))
=> 2
(nestFind '(a (b) ((c)) d e f))
=> 3
(nestFind '(a (((b c d))) (e) ((f)) g))
=> 4
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/23484728/how-to-find-the-maximum-nesting-depth-of-a-s-expression-in-scheme