问题
I'm learning to write a simple shell code using assembly. I get a Segment fault when the mov opcode executes to write over the db data. Why? Any guidance appreciated! Debugging with gdb confirms the data is contiguous with the code at run time and readelf analysis of the program confirms the data segment is writeable.
section .text
global _start
_start:
; The following code calls execve("/bin/sh", argv, envp=0)
jmp short two
one:
pop ebx
xor eax, eax
mov [ebx+12], eax
mov [ebx+7], al
mov [ebx+8], ebx
lea ecx, [ebx+8]
lea edx, [ebx+12]
mov al, 11
int 0x80
two:
call one
section .data align=1
db '/bin/shzargvenvp'
Additional info after reading comments:
It Segment faults when run stand-alone on the linux command line (./myshdb), and also when I step into the mov instruction using gdb (set break at "one", run, then step repeatedly).
Yes compiling on and running on a 32bit Ubuntu installation. Here are the various command lines I'm using (which all work fine for a variant shell code effort):
nasm -f elf32 -g -F stabs myshdb.s -o myshdb.o
objdump -Mintel --disassemble myshdb.o
ld myshdb.o -o myshdb
readelf -a myshdb
gdb myshdb
Using different algorithms, the compile and commands all work fine and the program runs fine. It's something about the proximity of data immediately after code and trying to write into the data section that is giving me trouble. Initially it was all .text section, but that clearly is read-only, so I thought a data declaration aligned on 1-byte boundaries would work. The 1-byte boundary works, but somehow the write isn't working even though readelf says it's loaded writeable. Notice the 16 bytes (size=0x10) in the data segment with the "W" flag.
Section Headers:
[Nr] Name Type Addr Off Size ES Flg Lk Inf Al
[ 0] NULL 00000000 000000 000000 00 0 0 0
[ 1] .text PROGBITS 08048080 000080 000025 00 AX 0 0 16
[ 2] .data PROGBITS 080490a5 0000a5 000010 00 WA 0 0 1
[ 3] .stab PROGBITS 00000000 0000b8 0000d8 0c 4 0 4
[ 4] .stabstr STRTAB 00000000 000190 00000a 00 0 0 1
[ 5] .shstrtab STRTAB 00000000 00029b 000036 00 0 0 1
[ 6] .symtab SYMTAB 00000000 00019c 0000d0 10 7 9 4
[ 7] .strtab STRTAB 00000000 00026c 00002f 00 0 0 1
Key to Flags:
W (write), A (alloc), X (execute), M (merge), S (strings)
I (info), L (link order), G (group), T (TLS), E (exclude), x (unknown)
O (extra OS processing required) o (OS specific), p (processor specific)
Does data immediately follow code? gdb output below, halted just before executing the first mov opcode. Data appears contiguous after code. EBX contains address 0x80480a5, which points to valid string data immediately after code. Examining memory (x 0x80480a5) also confirms a contiguous location.
[----------------------------------registers-----------------------------------]
EAX: 0x0
EBX: 0x80480a5 ("/bin/shZargvenvp")
ECX: 0x0
EDX: 0x0
ESI: 0x0
EDI: 0x0
EBP: 0x0
ESP: 0xbfffeda0 --> 0x1
EIP: 0x804808d (<one+3>: mov DWORD PTR [ebx+0xc],eax)
EFLAGS: 0x246 (carry PARITY adjust ZERO sign trap INTERRUPT direction overflow)
[-------------------------------------code-------------------------------------]
0x8048088 <zero>: jmp 0x80480a0 <two>
0x804808a <one>: pop ebx
0x804808b <one+1>: xor eax,eax
=> 0x804808d <one+3>: mov DWORD PTR [ebx+0xc],eax
0x8048090 <one+6>: mov DWORD PTR [ebx+0x8],ebx
0x8048093 <one+9>: mov BYTE PTR [ebx+0x7],al
0x8048096 <one+12>: lea ecx,[ebx+0x8]
0x8048099 <one+15>: lea edx,[ebx+0xc]
[------------------------------------------------------------------------------]
Legend: code, data, rodata, value
0x0804808d in one ()
gdb-peda$ x 0x80480a5
0x80480a5: "/bin/shZargvenvp"
@Employed Russian asked for printout from reaelf -Wl. Here is the information when I rebuilt things from scratch:
---------- code snippet compiled with nasm, ld -----------------
zero: jmp short two
one: pop ebx
xor eax, eax
mov [ebx+12], eax
mov [ebx+8], ebx
mov [ebx+7], al
lea ecx, [ebx+8]
lea edx, [ebx+12]
mov al, 11
int 0x80
two: call one
section .data align=1
msg: db '/bin/sh0argvenvp'
-------- readelf output as requested --------
readelf -Wl myshdb
Elf file type is EXEC (Executable file)
Entry point 0x8048080
There are 2 program headers, starting at offset 52
Program Headers:
Type Offset VirtAddr PhysAddr FileSiz MemSiz Flg Align
LOAD 0x000000 0x08048000 0x08048000 0x0009d 0x0009d R E 0x1000
LOAD 0x00009d 0x0804909d 0x0804909d 0x00010 0x00010 RW 0x1000
Section to Segment mapping:
Segment Sections...
00 .text
01 .data
-------------- run with gdb and step to mov instructions ----------
---------------registers--------------
EAX: 0x0
EBX: 0x804809d ("/bin/sh0argvenvp")
----------- memory address checks ------------
gdb-peda$ p zero
$15 = {<text variable, no debug info>} 0x8048080 <zero>
gdb-peda$ p one
$16 = {<text variable, no debug info>} 0x8048082 <one>
gdb-peda$ p two
$17 = {<text variable, no debug info>} 0x8048098 <two>
gdb-peda$ p $ebx
$18 = 0x804809d
gdb-peda$ p msg
$19 = 0x6e69622f
gdb-peda$ x 0x804809d
0x804809d: "/bin/sh0argvenvp"
gdb-peda$ x msg
0x6e69622f: <error: Cannot access memory at address 0x6e69622f>
In other words, the string message is available from a memory location directly after code (0x804809d). Yet msg label maps to 0x6e69622f, how can I see the data there with gdb? What does reaelf -Wl output tell me?
回答1:
Debugging with gdb confirms the data is contiguous with the code at run time and readelf analysis of the program confirms the data segment is writeable.
You are expecting db '...' to immediately follow CALL one.
That does not actually happen, your .data section is in a different segment (because it needs different permissions):
readelf -Wl myshdb
Program Headers:
Type Offset VirtAddr PhysAddr FileSiz MemSiz Flg Align
LOAD 0x000000 0x08048000 0x08048000 0x00094 0x00094 R 0x1000
LOAD 0x001000 0x08049000 0x08049000 0x0001d 0x0001d R E 0x1000
LOAD 0x002000 0x0804a000 0x0804a000 0x00010 0x00010 RW 0x1000
Section to Segment mapping:
Segment Sections...
00
01 .text
02 .data
Note that .data is in the second LOAD segment, and that segment begins on a different page.
What may be confusing you is that your linker may leave a copy of .data following code for two (my version doesn't -- it's all 0s for me).
In any case, your code as is tries to write to the first LOAD segment, to location immediately after the end of two, but that segment is (clearly) not writable.
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62841443/why-segment-fault-when-writing-to-writeable-data-section-using-ubuntu-x86-na