问题
My elasticSearch query is like:
{
"size": 0,
"aggs": {
"group_by_id": {
"terms": {
"field": "Infos.InstanceInfo.ID.keyword",
"size": 1000
},
"aggs": {
"tops": {
"top_hits": {
"size": 100,
"sort": {
"Infos.InstanceInfo.StartTime": "asc"
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
It works fine, I have a result of this form:
aggregations
=========>group_by_id
==============>buckets
{key:id1}
===============>docs
{doc1.Status:"KO"}
{doc2.Status:"KO"}
{key:id2}
===============>docs
{doc1.Status:"KO"}
{doc2.Status:"OK"}
{key:id3}
===============>docs
{doc1.Status:"KO"}
{doc2.Status:"OK"}
I'm trying to add a filter, so when "OK" the result must be like this:
aggregations
=========>group_by_id
==============>buckets
{key:id2}
===============>docs
{doc1.Status:"KO"}
{doc2.Status:"OK"}
{key:id3}
===============>docs
{doc1.Status:"KO"}
{doc2.Status:"OK"}
and for "KO" :
aggregations
=========>group_by_id
==============>buckets
{key:id1}
===============>docs
{doc1.Status:"KO"}
{doc2.Status:"KO"}
Fields "Startime" & "Status" are at the same level "Infos.InstanceInfo.[...]" Any idea?
EDIT
Sample docs:
{
"took" : 794,
"timed_out" : false,
"_shards" : {
"total" : 1,
"successful" : 1,
"skipped" : 0,
"failed" : 0
},
"hits" : {
"total" : {
"value" : 10000,
"relation" : "gte"
},
"max_score" : null,
"hits" : [ ]
},
"aggregations" : {
"group_by_id" : {
"doc_count_error_upper_bound" : 0,
"sum_other_doc_count" : 143846,
"buckets" : [
{
"key" : "1000",
"doc_count" : 6,
"tops" : {
"hits" : {
"total" : {
"value" : 6,
"relation" : "eq"
},
"max_score" : null,
"hits" : [
{
"_index" : "azerty",
"_type" : "_doc",
"_id" : "vHFvoXYBVWrYChNi7hB7",
"_score" : null,
"_source" : {
"Infos" : {
"InstanceInfo" : {
"ID" : "1000",
"StartTime" : "2020-12-27T00:43:56.011+01:00",
"status" : "KO"
}
}
},
"sort" : [
1609026236011
]
},
{
"_index" : "azerty",
"_type" : "_doc",
"_id" : "xHFvoXYBVWrYChNi7xAB",
"_score" : null,
"_source" : {
"Infos" : {
"InstanceInfo" : {
"ID" : "1000",
"StartTime" : "2020-12-27T00:43:56.145+01:00",
"status" : "OK"
}
}
},
"sort" : [
1609026236145
]
},
{
"_index" : "azerty",
"_type" : "_doc",
"_id" : "xXFvoXYBVWrYChNi7xAC",
"_score" : null,
"_source" : {
"Infos" : {
"InstanceInfo" : {
"ID" : "1000",
"StartTime" : "2020-12-27T00:43:56.147+01:00",
"status" : "OK"
}
}
},
"sort" : [
1609026236147
]
},
{
"_index" : "azerty",
"_type" : "_doc",
"_id" : "x3FvoXYBVWrYChNi7xAs",
"_score" : null,
"_source" : {
"Infos" : {
"InstanceInfo" : {
"ID" : "1000",
"StartTime" : "2020-12-27T00:43:56.188+01:00",
"status" : "OK"
}
}
},
"sort" : [
1609026236188
]
},
{
"_index" : "azerty",
"_type" : "_doc",
"_id" : "yHFvoXYBVWrYChNi7xAs",
"_score" : null,
"_source" : {
"Infos" : {
"InstanceInfo" : {
"ID" : "1000",
"StartTime" : "2020-12-27T00:43:56.19+01:00",
"status" : "OK"
}
}
},
"sort" : [
1609026236190
]
},
{
"_index" : "azerty",
"_type" : "_doc",
"_id" : "ynFvoXYBVWrYChNi7xBd",
"_score" : null,
"_source" : {
"Infos" : {
"InstanceInfo" : {
"ID" : "1000",
"StartTime" : "2020-12-27T00:43:56.236+01:00",
"status" : "OK"
}
}
},
"sort" : [
1609026236236
]
}
]
}
}
},
{
"key" : "2000",
"doc_count" : 2,
"tops" : {
"hits" : {
"total" : {
"value" : 2,
"relation" : "eq"
},
"max_score" : null,
"hits" : [
{
"_index" : "azerty",
"_type" : "_doc",
"_id" : "7HL_onYBVWrYChNij4Is",
"_score" : null,
"_source" : {
"Infos" : {
"InstanceInfo" : {
"ID" : "2000",
"StartTime" : "2020-12-27T08:00:26.011+01:00",
"status" : "KO"
}
}
},
"sort" : [
1609052426011
]
},
{
"_index" : "azerty",
"_type" : "_doc",
"_id" : "9HL_onYBVWrYChNij4Kz",
"_score" : null,
"_source" : {
"Infos" : {
"InstanceInfo" : {
"ID" : "2000",
"StartTime" : "2020-12-27T08:00:26.146+01:00",
"status" : "KO"
}
}
},
"sort" : [
1609052426146
]
}
]
}
}
},
{
"key" : "3000",
"doc_count" : 6,
"tops" : {
"hits" : {
"total" : {
"value" : 6,
"relation" : "eq"
},
"max_score" : null,
"hits" : [
{
"_index" : "azerty",
"_type" : "_doc",
"_id" : "7nNRpHYBVWrYChNiiruh",
"_score" : null,
"_source" : {
"Infos" : {
"InstanceInfo" : {
"ID" : "3000",
"StartTime" : "2020-12-27T14:09:36.015+01:00",
"status" : "KO"
}
}
},
"sort" : [
1609074576015
]
},
{
"_index" : "azerty",
"_type" : "_doc",
"_id" : "9nNRpHYBVWrYChNii7s5",
"_score" : null,
"_source" : {
"Infos" : {
"InstanceInfo" : {
"ID" : "3000",
"StartTime" : "2020-12-27T14:09:36.166+01:00",
"status" : "OK"
}
}
},
"sort" : [
1609074576166
]
},
{
"_index" : "azerty",
"_type" : "_doc",
"_id" : "93NRpHYBVWrYChNii7s5",
"_score" : null,
"_source" : {
"Infos" : {
"InstanceInfo" : {
"ID" : "3000",
"StartTime" : "2020-12-27T14:09:36.166+01:00",
"status" : "OK"
}
}
},
"sort" : [
1609074576166
]
},
{
"_index" : "azerty",
"_type" : "_doc",
"_id" : "-XNRpHYBVWrYChNii7ti",
"_score" : null,
"_source" : {
"Infos" : {
"InstanceInfo" : {
"ID" : "3000",
"StartTime" : "2020-12-27T14:09:36.209+01:00",
"status" : "OK"
}
}
},
"sort" : [
1609074576209
]
},
{
"_index" : "azerty",
"_type" : "_doc",
"_id" : "-nNRpHYBVWrYChNii7ts",
"_score" : null,
"_source" : {
"Infos" : {
"InstanceInfo" : {
"ID" : "3000",
"StartTime" : "2020-12-27T14:09:36.219+01:00",
"status" : "OK"
}
}
},
"sort" : [
1609074576219
]
},
{
"_index" : "azerty",
"_type" : "_doc",
"_id" : "_HNRpHYBVWrYChNii7ud",
"_score" : null,
"_source" : {
"Infos" : {
"InstanceInfo" : {
"ID" : "3000",
"StartTime" : "2020-12-27T14:09:36.269+01:00",
"status" : "OK"
}
}
},
"sort" : [
1609074576269
]
}
]
}
}
}
]
}
}
}
回答1:
Assuming the status field is under Infos.InstanceInfo and it's of the keyword mapping, you can utilize the filter aggregation:
{
"size": 0,
"aggs": {
"status_KO_only": {
"filter": { <--
"term": {
"Infos.InstanceInfo.Status": "KO"
}
},
"aggs": {
"group_by_id": {
"terms": {
"field": "Infos.InstanceInfo.ID.keyword",
"size": 1000
},
"aggs": {
"tops": {
"top_hits": {
"size": 100,
"sort": {
"Infos.InstanceInfo.StartTime": "asc"
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
In this particular case you could've applied the same term query in the query part of the search request without having to use a filter aggregation.
If you want to get both OK and KO in the same request, you can copy/paste the whole status_KO_only aggregation, rename the 2nd one, and voila -- you now have both groups in one request. You can of course have as many differently named (top-level) filter aggs as you like.
Now, when you indeed need multiple filter aggs at once, there's a more elegant way that does not require copy-pasting -- enter the filters aggregation:
{
"size": 0,
"aggs": {
"by_statuses": {
"filters": { <--
"filters": {
"status_KO": {
"term": {
"Infos.InstanceInfo.Status": "KO"
}
},
"status_OK": {
"term": {
"Infos.InstanceInfo.Status": "OK"
}
}
}
},
"aggs": {
"group_by_id": {
"terms": {
"field": "Infos.InstanceInfo.ID.keyword",
"size": 1000
},
"aggs": {
"tops": {
"top_hits": {
"size": 100,
"sort": {
"Infos.InstanceInfo.StartTime": "asc"
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
Any of the child sub-aggregations will automatically be the buckets of the explicitly declared term filters.
I personally find the copy/paste approach more readable, esp. when constructing such requests dynamically (based on UI dropdowns and such.)
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65449336/elasticsearch-filter-buckets