Wrong understanding of 'if constexpr'

与世无争的帅哥 提交于 2020-12-26 07:53:48

问题


I have following code

static constexpr bool condition = true;

int square(int num) {
    if constexpr (condition) {
      return num * num;
    } else {
      x
      return num;
    }
}

int main() {
    return square(3);
}

compiled with

-std=gnu++17

My assumption for

if constexpr (condition)

was that during compilation the part

    } else {
      x
      return num;
    }

get discarded and I get no error about the undefined

x

Is my understanding wrong that this 'if constexpr' is something like

#ifdef CONDITION
  return num * num;
#else
  x
  return num;
#endif

How do I modify this code that I can compile this?

Thanks for the help


回答1:


How do I modify this code that I can compile this?

To fix your code, simply remove the line with x.

Is my understanding wrong that this 'if constexpr' is something like [...]

Yes, your understanding is wrong. From cppreference:

Outside a template, a discarded statement is fully checked. if constexpr is not a substitute for the #if preprocessing directive.

This means every branch in an if constexpr block must be valid C++, even if it's never going to be used.



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58300760/wrong-understanding-of-if-constexpr

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!