How to add more OR searches with CONTAINS Brings Query to Crawl?

问题

I have a simple query that relies on two full-text indexed tables, but it runs extremely slow when I have the CONTAINS combined with any additional OR search. As seen in the execution plan, the two full text searches crush the performance. If I query with just 1 of the CONTAINS, or neither, the query is sub-second, but the moment you add OR into the mix the query becomes ill-fated.

The two tables are nothing special, they're not overly wide (42 cols in one, 21 in the other; maybe 10 cols are FT indexed in each) or even contain very many records (36k recs in the biggest of the two).

I was able to solve the performance by splitting the two CONTAINS searches into their own SELECT queries and then UNION the three together. Is this UNION workaround my only hope?

SELECT     a.CollectionID
FROM       collections    a
INNER JOIN determinations b ON a.CollectionID = b.CollectionID 
WHERE      a.CollrTeam_Text LIKE '%fa%'
           OR CONTAINS(a.*, '"*fa*"')
           OR CONTAINS(b.*, '"*fa*"')

Execution Plan:

回答1:

I'd be curious to see if a LEFT JOIN to an equivalent CONTAINSTABLE would perform any better. Something like:

SELECT     a.CollectionID
FROM       collections    a
INNER JOIN determinations b ON a.CollectionID = b.CollectionID 
LEFT JOIN CONTAINSTABLE(a, *, '"*fa*"') ct1 on a.CollectionID = ct1.[Key]
LEFT JOIN CONTAINSTABLE(b, *, '"*fa*"') ct2 on b.CollectionID = ct2.[Key]
WHERE      a.CollrTeam_Text LIKE '%fa%'
           OR ct1.[Key] IS NOT NULL
           OR ct2.[Key] IS NOT NULL

回答2:

I was going to suggest to UNION each as their own query, but as I read your question I saw that you have found that. I can't think of a better way, so if it helps use it. The UNION method is a common approach to a poor performing query that has several OR conditions where each performs well on its own.

回答3:

I would probably use the UNION. If you are really against it, you might try something like:

SELECT a.CollectionID
FROM collections a
  LEFT OUTER JOIN (SELECT CollectionID FROM collections WHERE CONTAINS(*, '"*fa*"')) c
    ON c.CollectionID = a.CollectionID
  LEFT OUTER JOIN (SELECT CollectionID FROM determinations WHERE CONTAINS(*, '"*fa*"')) d
    ON d.CollectionID = a.CollectionID
WHERE a.CollrTeam_Text LIKE '%fa%'
   OR c.CollectionID IS NOT NULL
   OR d.CollectionID IS NOT NULL

回答4:

We've experience the exact same problem and at the time, put it down to our query being badly formed - that SQL 2005 had let us get away with it, but 2008 wouldn't.

In the end, we split the query into 2 SELECTs that were called using an IF. Glad someone else has had the same problem and that it's a known issue. We were seeing queries on a table with ~150,000 rows + full-text going from < 1 second (2005) to 30+ seconds (2008).

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2906812/how-to-add-more-or-searches-with-contains-brings-query-to-crawl