问题
The scenario
I have a file server that acts as a master storage for the files to sync and I have several clients that have a local copy of the master storage. Each client may alter files from the master storage, add new ones or delete existing ones. I would like all of them to stay in sync as good as possible by regularly performing a sync operation, yet the only tool I have available everywhere for that is rsync
and I can only run script code on the clients, not on the server.
The problem
rsync
doesn't perform a bi-directional sync, so I have to sync from server to client as well as from client to server. This works okay for files that just changed by running two rsync
operations but it fails when files have been added or deleted. If I don't use rsync
with a delete option, clients cannot ever delete files as the sync from the server to the client restores them. If I use a delete option, then either the sync from server to client runs first and deletes all new files the client has added or the sync from client to server runs first and deletes all new files other clients have added to the server.
The question
Apparently rsync
alone cannot handle that situation, since it is only supposted to bring one location in sync with another location. I surely neeed to write some code but I can only rely on POSIX shell scripting, which seems to make achieving my goals impossible. So can it even be done with rsync
?
回答1:
What is required for this sceanrio are three sync operations and awareness which files the local client has added/deleted since the last sync. This awareness is essential and establishes a state, which rsync
doesn't have, as rsync
is stateless; when it runs it knows nothing about previous or future operations. And yes, it can be done with some simple POSIX scripting.
We will assume three variables are set:
metaDir
is a directory where the client can persistently store files related to the sync operations; the content itself is not synced.localDir
is the local copy of the files to be synced.remoteStorage
is any validrsync
source/target (can be a mounted directory or an rsync protocol endpoint, with or w/o SSH tunneling).
After every successful sync, we create a file in the meta dir that lists all files in local dir, we need this to track files getting added or deleted in between two syncs. In case no such file exists, we have never ran a successful sync. In that case we just sync all files from remote storage, build such a file, and we are done:
filesAfterLastSync="$metaDir/files_after_last_sync.txt"
if [ ! -f "$metaDir/files_after_last_sync.txt" ]; then
rsync -a "$remoteStorage/" "$localDir"
( cd "$localDir" && find . ) | sed "s/^\.//" | sort > "$filesAfterLastSync"
exit 0
fi
Why ( cd "$localDir" && find . ) | sed "s/^\.//"
? Files need to be rooted at $localDir
for rsync
later on. If a file $localDir/test.txt
exists, the generated output file line must be /test.txt
and nothing else. Without the cd
and an absolute path for the find
command, it would contain /..abspath../test.txt
and without the sed
it would contain ./test.txt
. Why the explicite sort
call? See further downwards.
If that isn't our initial sync, we should create a temporary directoy that auto-deletes itself when the script terminates, no matter which way:
tmpDir=$( mktemp -d )
trap 'rm -rf "$tmpDir"' EXIT
Then we create a file list of all files currently in local dir:
filesForThisSync="$tmpDir/files_for_this_sync.txt"
( cd "$localDir" && find . ) | sed "s/^\.//" | sort > "$filesForThisSync"
Okay, so what about that sort
call? The reason is that I need the file list to be sorted below. Okay, you say, but then why not telling find
to sort the list? That's because find
does not guarantee to sort the same was as sort
does (that's explicitely documented on the man page) and I need exactly the order that sort
produces.
Now we need to create two special file lists, one containing all files that were added since last sync and one that contains all files that were deleted since last sync. Doing so is a bit tricky with just POSIX but various possibility exists. Here's one of them:
newFiles="$tmpDir/files_added_since_last_sync.txt"
join -t "" -v 2 "$filesAfterLastSync" "$filesForThisSync" > "$newFiles"
deletedFiles="$tmpDir/files_removed_since_last_sync.txt"
join -t "" -v 1 "$filesAfterLastSync" "$filesForThisSync" > "$deletedFiles"
By setting the delimiter to an empty string, join
compares whole lines. Usually the output would contain all lines that exists in both files but we instruct join to only output lines of one of the files that cannot be matched with the lines of the other file. Lines that only exist in the second file must be from files have been added and lines that only exist in the first file file must be from files that have been deleted. And that's why I use sort
above as join
can only work correctly if the lines were sorted by sort
.
Finally we perform three sync operations. First we sync all new files to the remote storage to ensure these are not getting lost when we start working with delete operations:
rsync -aum --files-from="$newFiles" "$localDir/" "$remoteStorage"
What is -aum
? -a
means archive, which means sync recursive, keep symbolic links, keep file permissions, keep all timestamps, try to keep ownership and group and some other (it's a shortcut for -rlptgoD). -u
means update, which means if a file already exists at the destination, only sync if the source file has a newer last modification date. -m
means prune empty directories (you can leave it out, if that isn't desired).
Next we sync from remote storage to local with deletion, to get all changes and file deletions performed by other clients, yet we exclude the files that have been deleted locally, as otherwise those would get restored what we don't want:
rsync -aum --delete --exclude-from="$deletedFiles" "$remoteStorage/" "$localDir"
And finally we sync from local to remote storage with deletion, to update files that were changed locally and delete files that were deleted locally.
rsync -aum --delete "$localDir/" "$remoteStorage"
Some people might think that this is too complicated and it can be done with just two syncs. First sync remote to local with deletion and exclude all files that were either added or deleted locally (that way we also only need to produce a single special file, which is even easier to produce). Then sync local to remote with deletion and exclude nothing. Yet this approach is faulty. It requires a third sync to be correct.
Consider this case: Client A created FileX but hasn't synced yet. Client B also creates FileX a bit later and syncs at once. When now client A performs the two syncs above, FileX on remote storage is newer and should replace FileX on client A but that won't happen. The first sync explicitly excludes FileX (it was added to client A) and the second one will not upload it, as the version on the remote storage is newer.
To fix that, a third sync from remote to local without any exclusion is required. So you would also end up with a three sync operations and compared to the three ones I presented above, I think the ones above are always equally fast and sometimes even faster, so I would prefer the ones above, however, the choice is yours. Also if you don't need to support that edge case, you can skip the last sync operation. The problem will then resolve automatically on next sync.
Finally, --delete
implies --delete-before
or --delete-during
, depending on your version of rsync
. You may prefer another or explicit specified delete operation.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64120408/is-it-possible-to-sync-multiple-clients-over-a-central-server-using-just-rsync-a