After finding that FutureTask
running in a Executors.newCachedThreadPool()
on Java 1.6 (and from Eclipse) swallows exceptions in the Runnable.run()
method, I've tried to come up with a way to catch these without adding throw/catch to all my Runnable
implementations.
The API suggests that overriding FutureTask.setException()
should help in this:
Causes this future to report an ExecutionException with the given throwable as its cause, unless this Future has already been set or has been cancelled. This method is invoked internally by the run method upon failure of the computation.
However this method doesn't seem to be called (running with the debugger shows the exception is caught by FutureTask
, but setException
isn't called). I've written the following program to reproduce my problem:
public class RunTest {
public static void main(String[] args) {
MyFutureTask t = new MyFutureTask(new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
throw new RuntimeException("Unchecked exception");
}
});
ExecutorService service = Executors.newCachedThreadPool();
service.submit(t);
}
}
public class MyFutureTask extends FutureTask<Object> {
public MyFutureTask(Runnable r) {
super(r, null);
}
@Override
protected void setException(Throwable t) {
super.setException(t);
System.out.println("Exception: " + t);
}
}
My main question is: How can I catch Exceptions thrown in a FutureTask? Why doesn't setException
get called?
Also I would like to know why the Thread.UncaughtExceptionHandler
mechanism isn't used by FutureTask
, is there any reason for this?
setException
probably isn't made for overriding, but is provided to let you set the result to an exception, should the need arise. What you want to do is override the done()
method and try to get the result:
public class MyFutureTask extends FutureTask<Object> {
public MyFutureTask(Runnable r) {
super(r, null);
}
@Override
protected void done() {
try {
if (!isCancelled()) get();
} catch (ExecutionException e) {
// Exception occurred, deal with it
System.out.println("Exception: " + e.getCause());
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
// Shouldn't happen, we're invoked when computation is finished
throw new AssertionError(e);
}
}
}
Have you tried using an UncaughtExceptionHandler
?
- You need to implement the
UncaughtExceptionHandler
interface. - To set an
UncaughtExceptionHandler
for pool threads, provide aThreadFactory
in theExecutor.newCachedThreadPool(ThreadFactory)
call. - You can set the UncaughtExceptionHandler for the created thread via
setUncaughtExceptionHandler(Thread.UncaughtExceptionHandler eh)
Submit the tasks with ExecutorService.execute
, because only exceptions thrown from tasks submitted with execute
make it to the uncaught exception handler. For Tasks submitted with ExecutorService.submit
any thrown exception is considered to be part of the task's return value. If a task submitted with submit terminates with an exception, it is rethrown when calling Future.get
, wrapped in an ExecutionException
A much better solution: Java FutureTask completion check
When you call futureTask.get()
to retrieve the result of the computation it will throw an exception (ExecutionException) if the underlying Runnable
/Callable
threw an exception.
ExecutionException.getCause()
will return the exception that the Runnable
/Callable
threw.
It will also throw a different exception if the Runnable
/Callable
was canceled.
I have looked at the source code of FutureTask
and could not find where setException
is being called.
There is an innerSetException
method from FutureTask.Sync
(inner class of FutureTask
) that is being called in case of an Throwable
being thrown by the run method. This method is also being called in setException
.
So it seams like the javadoc is not correct (or very hard to understand...).
There are three standard ways and one improvised way. 1. use UncaughtExceptionHandler, set the UncaughtExceptionHandler for the created thread as
Thread.setDefaultUncaughtExceptionHandler(new Thread.UncaughtExceptionHandler() {
public void uncaughtException(Thread t, Throwable ex) {..}}
*But the limitation is it catches the exception thrown by thread but in case of future task, it is swallowed.
2. use afterExecute
after making a custom threadpoolexecutor with hook that has been provided specially for this purpose. Looking through the code of ThreadpoolExecutor, via submit > execute (there is a workQueue, workQueue.offer
), the tasks are added to the work queue
final void runWorker(Worker arg0) {
Thread arg1 = Thread.currentThread();
Runnable arg2 = arg0.firstTask;
..
while(arg2 != null || (arg2 = this.**getTask()**) != null) {
arg0.lock();
..
try {
this.beforeExecute(arg1, arg2);
Object arg4 = null;
try {
arg2.run();
} catch (RuntimeException arg27) {
..
} finally {
this.**afterExecute**(arg2, (Throwable)arg4);
}
}
getTask() {..
this.workQueue.**poll**();
..}
Then, the third is using simple try catch inside the call method but you can not catch the exception outside here.
The workaround is calling all the call methods from a call method of a TaskFactory, a factory that releases callables.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3555302/how-to-catch-exceptions-in-futuretask