问题
I'm having trouble creating a unit test without needing robolectric. I am using AndroidThreeTen.init(this) in my code and when I run my test if I disable robolectric I get an error:
org.threeten.bp.zone.ZoneRulesException: No time-zone data files registered
and if I leave it enabled I get this:
[Robolectric] com.mycomp.,yapp.utilities.log.LogTest.on Calling function w it returns an Int: sdk=28; resources=BINARY
I have tried using testImplementation ‘com.jakewharton.threetenabp:threetenabp:1.1.0’ made no difference. I have AndroidThreeTen.init(this) called in my application and testApplication. any ideas? this is my test
@Test
fun `on Calling function i it returns an Int`() {
assertThat("Returned class is not an Int", Log.i("Test", "Test"), isA(Int::class.java))
assertThat("Returned Int is not 0", Log.i("Test", "Test"), `is`(0))
}
Or do I have to use robolectric because of this? (Side note: Log is not the util.log from android but my own class) (edited)
回答1:
JVM unit tests don't run on Android runtime. Instead of ThreeTenABP, you can just use ThreeTenBP directly to get the same API initialised for a regular JVM.
In my project build.gradle I use a setup like:
implementation "com.jakewharton.threetenabp:threetenabp:${threetenabpVersion}"
testImplementation("org.threeten:threetenbp:${threetenbpVersion}") {
exclude module: "com.jakewharton.threetenabp:threetenabp:${threetenabpVersion}"
}
where
threetenabpVersion = '1.2.0'
threetenbpVersion = '1.3.8'
This uses ThreeTenBP via ThreeTenABP normally, but in unit test configuration it adds TreeTenBP directly as a dependency, with its init code. Cannot remember exactly why I put in the exclude
rule; it's been like that for a few years already.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55340569/androidthreeten-not-working-in-unit-test-without-robolectric