I tried to scrub the GCC man page for this, but still don't get it, really.
What's the difference between -march
and -mtune
?
When does one use just -march
, vs. both? Is it ever possible to just -mtune
?
If you use -march
then GCC will be free to generate instructions that work on the specified CPU, but not on (typically) earlier CPUs in the architecture family. If you use -mtune
, then the compiler will generate code that works on any of them, but will favour instruction sequences that run fastest on the specific CPU you indicated.
This is what i've googled up:
The -march=X
option takes a CPU name X
and allows GCC to generate code that uses all features of X
. GCC manual explains exactly which CPU names mean which CPU families and features.
Because features are usually added, but not removed, a binary built with -march=X
will run on CPU X
, has a good chance to run on CPUs newer than X
, but it will almost assuredly not run on anything older than X
. Certain instruction sets (3DNow!, i guess?) may be specific to a particular CPU vendor, making use of these will probably get you binaries that don't run on competing CPUs, newer or otherwise.
The -mtune=Y
option tunes the generated code to run faster on Y
than on other CPUs it might run on. -march=X
implies -mtune=X
. -mtune=Y
will not override -march=X
, so, for example, it probably makes no sense to -march=core2
and -mtune=i686
- your code will not run on anything older than core2
anyway, because of -march=core2
, so why on Earth would you want to optimize for something older (less featureful) than core2? -march=core2 -mtune=haswell
makes more sense: don't use any features beyond what core2
provides (which is still a lot more than what -march=i686
gives you!), but do optimize code for much newer haswell
CPUs, not for core2
.
There's also -mtune=generic
. generic
makes GCC produce code that runs best on current CPUs (meaning of generic
changes from one version of GCC to another). There are rumors on Gentoo forums that -march=X -mtune=generic
produces code that runs faster on X
than code produced by -march=X -mtune=X
does (or just -march=X
, as -mtune=X
is implied). No idea if this is true or not.
Generally, unless you know exactly what you need, it seems that the best course is to specify -march=<oldest CPU you want to run on>
and -mtune=generic
(-mtune=generic
is here to counter the implicit -mtune=<oldest CPU you want to run on>
, because you probably don't want to optimize for the oldest CPU). Or just -march=native
, if you ever going to run only on the same machine you build on.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10559275/gcc-how-is-march-different-from-mtune