问题
I'm using a recursive function to sort a list in Python, and I want to keep track of the number of sorts/merges as the function continues. However, when I declare/initialize the variable inside the function, it becomes a local variable inside each successive call of the function. If I declare the variable outside the function, the function thinks it doesn't exist (i.e. has no access to it). How can I share this value across different calls of the function?
I tried to use the "global" variable tag inside and outside the function like this:
global invcount ## I tried here, with and without the global tag
def inv_sort (listIn):
global invcount ## and here, with and without the global tag
if (invcount == undefined): ## can't figure this part out
invcount = 0
#do stuff
But I cannot figure out how to check for the undefined status of the global variable and give it a value on the first recursion call (because on all successive recursions it should have a value and be defined).
My first thought was to return the variable out of each call of the function, but I can't figure out how to pass two objects out of the function, and I already have to pass the list out for the recursion sort to work. My second attempt to resolve this issue involved me adding the variable invcount
to the list I'm passing as the last element with an identifier, like "i27"
. Then I could just check for the presence of the identifier (the letter i
in this example) in the last element and if present pop() it off at the beginning of the function call and re-add it during the recursion. In practice this is becoming really convoluted and while it may work eventually, I'm wondering if there is a more practical or easier solution.
Is there a way to share a variable without directly passing/returning it?
回答1:
There's couple of things you can do. Taking your example you should modify it like this:
invcount = 0
def inv_sort (listIn):
global invcount
invcount += 1
# do stuff
But this approach means that you should zero invcount
before each call to inv_sort
.
So actually its better to return invcount
as a part of result. For example using tuples like this:
def inv_sort(listIn):
#somewhere in your code recursive call
recursive_result, recursive_invcount = inv_sort(argument)
# this_call_invcount includes recursive_invcount
return this_call_result, this_call_invcount
回答2:
An alternative might be using a default argument, e.g.:
def inv_sort(listIn, invcount=0):
...
invcount += 1
...
listIn, invcount = inv_sort(listIn, invcount)
...
return listIn, invcount
The downside of this is that your calls get slightly less neat:
l, _ = inv_sort(l) # i.e. ignore the second returned parameter
But this does mean that invcount
automatically gets reset each time the function is called with a single argument (and also provides the opportunity to inject a value of invcount
if necessary for testing: assert result, 6 == inv_sort(test, 5)
).
回答3:
There's no such thing as an "undefined" variable in Python, and you don't need one.
Outside the function, set the variable to 0. Inside the loop, use the global
keyword, then increment.
invcount = 0
def inv_sort (listIn):
global invcount
... do stuff ...
invcount += 1
回答4:
Assuming that you don't need to know the count inside the function, I would approach this using a decorator function:
import functools
def count_calls(f):
@functools.wraps(f)
def func(*args):
func.count += 1
return f(*args)
func.count = 0
return func
You can now decorate your recursive function:
@count_calls
def inv_sort(...):
...
And check or reset the count
before or after calling it:
inv_sort.count = 0
l = inv_sort(l)
print(inv_sort.count)
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/23762322/python-using-a-shared-variable-in-a-recursive-function