问题
In my home directory I have a folder drupal-6.14 that contains the Drupal platform.
From this directory I use the following command:
find drupal-6.14 -type f -iname \'*\' | grep -P \'drupal-6.14/(?!sites(?!/all|/default)).*\' | xargs tar -czf drupal-6.14.tar.gz
What this command does is gzips the folder drupal-6.14, excluding all subfolders of drupal-6.14/sites/ except sites/all and sites/default, which it includes.
My question is on the regular expression:
grep -P \'drupal-6.14/(?!sites(?!/all|/default)).*\'
The expression works to exclude all the folders I want excluded, but I don\'t quite understand why.
It is a common task using regular expressions to
Match all strings, except those that don\'t contain subpattern x. Or in other words, negating a subpattern.
I (think) I understand that the general strategy to solve these problems is the use of negative lookaheads, but I\'ve never understood to a satisfactory level how positive and negative look(ahead/behind)s work.
Over the years, I\'ve read many websites on them. The PHP and Python regex manuals, other pages like http://www.regular-expressions.info/lookaround.html and so forth, but I\'ve never really had a solid understanding of them.
Could someone explain, how this is working, and perhaps provide some similar examples that would do similar things?
-- Update One:
Regarding Andomar\'s response: can a double negative lookahead be more succinctly expressed as a single positive lookahead statement:
i.e Is:
\'drupal-6.14/(?!sites(?!/all|/default)).*\'
equivalent to:
\'drupal-6.14/(?=sites(?:/all|/default)).*\'
???
-- Update Two:
As per @andomar and @alan moore - you can\'t interchange double negative lookahead for positive lookahead.
回答1:
A negative lookahead says, at this position, the following regex can not match.
Let's take a simplified example:
a(?!b(?!c))
a Match: (?!b) succeeds
ac Match: (?!b) succeeds
ab No match: (?!b(?!c)) fails
abe No match: (?!b(?!c)) fails
abc Match: (?!b(?!c)) succeeds
The last example is a double negation: it allows a b followed by c. The nested negative lookahead becomes a positive lookahead: the c should be present.
In each example, only the a is matched. The lookahead is only a condition, and does not add to the matched text.
回答2:
Lookarounds can be nested.
So this regex matches "drupal-6.14/" that is not followed by "sites" that is not followed by "/all" or "/default".
Confusing? Using different words, we can say it matches "drupal-6.14/" that is not followed by "sites" unless that is further followed by "/all" or "/default"
回答3:
If you revise your regular expression like this:
drupal-6.14/(?=sites(?!/all|/default)).*
^^
...then it will match all inputs that contain drupal-6.14/ followed by sites followed by anything other than /all or /default. For example:
drupal-6.14/sites/foo
drupal-6.14/sites/bar
drupal-6.14/sitesfoo42
drupal-6.14/sitesall
Changing ?= to ?! to match your original regex simply negates those matches:
drupal-6.14/(?!sites(?!/all|/default)).*
^^
So, this simply means that drupal-6.14/ now cannot be followed by sites followed by anything other than /all or /default. So now, these inputs will satisfy the regex:
drupal-6.14/sites/all
drupal-6.14/sites/default
drupal-6.14/sites/all42
But, what may not be obvious from some of the other answers (and possibly your question) is that your regex will also permit other inputs where drupal-6.14/ is followed by anything other than sites as well. For example:
drupal-6.14/foo
drupal-6.14/xsites
Conclusion: So, your regex basically says to include all subdirectories of drupal-6.14 except those subdirectories of sites whose name begins with anything other than all or default.
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1749437/regular-expression-negative-lookahead