问题
We'd like to define mixin classes in regular .js files using jsDoc comments instead of .ts files.
An important aspect of mixin classes is constraining the generic type parameter to a class constructor using extends. E.g., the above page has the following TypeScript:
type Constructor<T> = new(...args: any[]) => T;
function Tagged<T extends Constructor<{}>>(Base: T) { ... }
TypeScript's jsDoc support allows for a @template T declaration, but we don't see any way to constrain T to, for example, be a class constructor. Is there some way to do that?
We'd be willing to create/use .d.ts files to support this, as long as the mixin declaration itself can exist in a .js file, and that checkJs will appropriately type-check the workings of that .js file.
回答1:
As of TypeScript 2.9 it seems constraining template parameters is now possible using TypeScript (see issue 24600). The above TypeScript declaration would therefor become:
/**
* @template T
* @typedef {new(...args: any[]) => T} Constructor
**/
/**
* @template {Constructor<{}>} T
* @param {T} Base
*/
function Tagged(Base) { … }
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44080759/is-it-possible-to-constrain-a-generic-type-defined-in-a-jsdoc-template-declarat