问题
I want to run programs in linux by a button click an therefore I wrote a function execute
:
void execute(const char* program_call, const char* param )
{
pid_t child = vfork();
if(child == 0) // child process
{
int child_pid = getpid();
char *args[2]; // arguments for exec
args[0] = (char*)program_call; // first argument is program_call
args[1] = (char*)param;
// close all opened file descriptors:
const char* prefix = "/proc/";
const char* suffix = "/fd/";
char child_proc_dir[16];
sprintf(child_proc_dir,"%s%d%s",prefix,child_pid, suffix);
DIR *dir;
struct dirent *ent;
if ((dir = opendir (child_proc_dir)) != NULL) {
// get files and directories within directory
while ((ent = readdir (dir)) != NULL) {
// convert file name to int
char* end;
int fd = strtol(ent->d_name, &end, 32);
if (!*end) // valid file descriptor
{
close(fd); // close file descriptor
// or set the flag FD_CLOEXEC
//fcntl( fd, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC );
}
}
closedir (dir);
}
else
{
cerr<< "can not open directory: " << child_proc_dir <<endl;
}
// replace the child process with exec*-function
execv(program_call,args);
_exit(2);
}
else if (child == -1) // fork error
{
if (errno == EAGAIN)
{
cerr<<“To much processes"<<endl;
}
else if (errno == ENOMEM)
{
cerr<<“Not enough space available."<<endl;
}
}
else // parent process
{
usleep(50); // give some time
if ( errno == EACCES)
{
cerr<<“Permission denied or process file not executable."<<endl;
}
else if ( errno == ENOENT)
{
cerr<<"\n Invalid path or file."<<endl;
}
int child_status;
if ( waitpid(child, &child_status, WNOHANG | WUNTRACED) < 0) // waitpid failed
{
cerr<<"Error - Execution failed"<<endl;
}
else if ( WIFEXITED( child_status ) && WEXITSTATUS( child_status ) != 0)
{
cerr<<“Child process error - Execution failed"<<endl;
}
}
}
There are two problems:
Closing the file descriptors causes some problems, for example Thunderbird crashes or VLC runs without sound. More exactly: closing of
stdout(1)
andstderr(2)
causes these problems. As I understand, closing file descriptor before exec only prevents them from been duplicated (there is no need to send informations from child process to parent process). Why does this affect the child process? Replacingclose()
by setting the flagFD_CLOEXEC
doesn't change anything. Also setting theFD_CLOEXEC
flag before fork doesn't solve the problem. Is there a better way to prevent inheritance of file descriptors?The return value of waitpid is often 0, even if the program call fails, I think because there are two (asynchrone) processes.
usleep(50)
solves this problem for my needs, but I hope there are better solutions for this problem.
I'm using vfork, but the same problems occur by using fork.
回答1:
First problem: There is no way to prevent inheritance of file descriptors except you close them yourself or set FD_CLOEXEC
, check this
Second problem: You got The return value of waitpid is often 0
, because you sepecfied WNOHANG
in waitpid
.
waitpid(): on success, returns the process ID of the child whose state has changed;
if WNOHANG was specified and one or more child(ren) specified by pid exist,
but have not yet changed state, then 0 is returned. On error, -1 is returned.
回答2:
First, in 2014, never use vfork
but simply fork(2). (Since vfork(2) is obsolete since POSIX 2001 and removed in POSIX 2008).
Then, the simplest way to close most of file descriptors is just
for (int fd=3; fd<256; fd++) (void) close(fd);
(hint: if a fd
is invalid, close(fd)
would fail and we ignore the failure; and you start from 3
to keep open 0==stdin, 1==stdout, 2==stderr; so in principle all the close
above would fail).
However, well behaved and well-written programs should not need such a loop on closing (so it is a crude way to overcome previous bugs).
Of course, if you know that some file descriptor other than stdin, stdout, stderr is valid and needed to the child program_call
(which is unlikely) you'll need to explicitly skip it.
and then use FD_CLOEXEC
as much as possible.
It is unlikely that your program would have a lot of file descriptors without you knowing them.
Maybe you want daemon(3) or (as commented by vality) posix_spawn.
If you need to explicitly close STDIN_FILENO
(i.e. 0), or STDOUT_FILENO
(i.e. 1), or STDERR_FILENO
(i.e. 2) you'll better open("/dev/null",
... and dup2
them after - before calling exec
, because most programs expect them to exist.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/27483556/why-does-closing-file-descriptors-after-fork-affect-the-child-process