Wait for sequence of action with a Redux Observable

百般思念 提交于 2020-02-17 05:00:42

问题


I have a use case where I need to wait for a sequence of actions before I dispatch another using Redux Observables. I've seen some similar questions but I cannot fathom how I can use these approaches for my given use case.

In essence I want to do something like so:

action$
  .ofType(PAGINATION_CLICKED) // This action occurred.
  .ofType(FETCH_SUCCESS) // Then this action occurred after.
  .map(() => analyticsAction()); // Dispatch analytics.

I would also like to cancel and start that sequence over again if another action of type FETCH_ERROR fires for example.


回答1:


Great question. The important point is that action$ is a hot/multicast stream of all actions as they are dispatched (it's a Subject). Since it's hot we can combine it multiple times and they'll all be listening to the same stream of actions.

// uses switchMap so if another PAGINATION_CLICKED comes in
// before FETCH_SUCCESS we start over

action$
  .ofType(PAGINATION_CLICKED)
  .switchMap(() =>
    action$.ofType(FETCH_SUCCESS)
      .take(1) // <-------------------- very important!
      .map(() => analyticsAction())
      .takeUntil(action$.ofType(FETCH_ERROR))
  );

So every time we receive PAGINATION_CLICKED we'll start listening to that inner Observable chain that listens for a single FETCH_SUCCESS. It's important to have that .take(1) because otherwise we'd continue to listen for more than one FETCH_SUCCESS which might cause strange bugs and even if not is just generally best practice to only take what you need.

We use takeUntil to cancel waiting for FETCH_SUCCESS if we receive FETCH_ERROR first.


As a bonus, if you decide you want also to do some analytics stuff based on the error too, not only start over, you can use race to indeed race between the two streams. First one to emit, wins; the other is unsubscribed.

action$
  .ofType(PAGINATION_CLICKED)
  .switchMap(() =>
    Observable.race(
      action$.ofType(FETCH_SUCCESS)
        .take(1)
        .map(() => analyticsAction()),
      action$.ofType(FETCH_ERROR)
        .take(1)
        .map(() => someOtherAnalyticsAction())
    )
  );

Here's the same thing, but using race as an instance operator instead of the static one. This is a stylistic preference you can choose. They both do the same thing. Use whichever one is more clear to you.

action$
  .ofType(PAGINATION_CLICKED)
  .switchMap(() =>
    action$.ofType(FETCH_SUCCESS)
      .map(() => analyticsAction())
      .race(
        action$.ofType(FETCH_ERROR)
          .map(() => someOtherAnalyticsAction())
      )
      .take(1)
  );


来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45546401/wait-for-sequence-of-action-with-a-redux-observable

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!