gprof reports no time accumulated

心不动则不痛 提交于 2019-11-27 14:58:12

If your program terminates in a non-clean manner then the profile data won't get written correctly - how is your program exiting?

Regardless, I'd strongly recommend using Shark instead of gprof - it's very easy to use and superior in pretty much every way to gprof - and doesn't require you to recompile your program.

I thought I might share this Apple mailing list discussion which I recently ran across.

The behaviour described here is exactly what I am experiencing. It looks like gprof has been broken on OSX for quite some time.

I've resorted to Shark which has been helpfully suggested by Dave Rigby.

Thanks!

How fast does your program run? If its extremely quick, it might be too fast to actually profile. I had this problem with a very simple text processing program: when I ran it with my sub-1kb test file it reported all 0s in the time columns. I solved this by running the entire text of The Great Gatsby through it. Try a larger dataset or looping through your main computation a few hundred times.

Does your program use multiple threads? I've experienced this issue with multithreaded programs on Linux, not sure if OS X would have the same problems

Here is a solution to the multithreading issue which I've used sucessfully in the past.

Perhaps not relevant to the OP's question, there is a common scenario where "no time accumulated" happens: if your code calls the kernel or calls libraries not compiled with -pg, you won't see any time accumulated for time spent there.

Btw, do you fork() in your code? If so, add this in the child process just after the fork():

extern void _start (void), etext (void);
monstartup ((u_long) &_start, (u_long) &etext);

That did the trick for me.

Tharun Meddi

the precision of time in gprof is 0.00. so maybe your module taking less time (milli sec/micro sec).Hence, it will show 0.00 and no time accumulated.So, run the whole program about 1000/1000000 times so that it will come to seconds.At last, divide obtained time with your looping factor (1000/1000000) and that going to be your processing time. I too faced the same problem and by doing this it gets solved.

标签
易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!