问题
Just say I have the following url that has a query string parameter that's an url:
http://www.someSite.com?next=http://www.anotherSite.com?test=1&test=2
Should I url encode the next
parameter? If I do, who's responsible for decoding it - the web browser, or my web app?
The reason I ask is I see lots of big sites that do things like the following
http://www.someSite.com?next=http://www.anotherSite.com/another/url
In the above, they don't bother encoding the next
parameter because I'm guessing, they know it doesn't have any query string parameters itself. Is this ok to do if my next
url doesn't include any query string parameters as well?
回答1:
RFC 2396 sec. 2.2 says that you should URL-encode those symbols anywhere where they're not used for their explicit meanings; i.e. you should always form targetUrl + '?next=' + urlencode(nextURL)
.
The web browser does not 'decode' those parameters at all; the browser doesn't know anything about the parameters but just passes along the string. A query string of the form http://www.example.com/path/to/query?param1=value¶m2=value2
is GET-requested by the browser as:
GET /path/to/query?param1=value¶m2=value2 HTTP/1.1
Host: www.example.com
(other headers follow)
On the backend, you'll need to parse the results. I think PHP's $_REQUEST
array will have already done this for you; in other languages you'll want to split over the first ?
character, then split over the &
characters, then split over the first =
character, then urldecode both the name and the value.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25979802/should-i-url-encode-a-query-string-parameter-thats-an-url