two level splatter TCL

半世苍凉 提交于 2020-01-25 19:01:05

问题


If I have a procedure or a command in TCL, with variable number of arguments, one can use, if a list's elements are as an input, the "splatter" operator, for example:

set a [list "ko" ]
set m [ list "ok" "bang" ]
lappend a {*}$m

But, what if I want to "twice splatter"? I.e., flatten 2 levels? Using it twice, in sequence, does not work:

set a [list "ko" ]
set m [ list [ list "ok" ] [ list "bang" ] ]
lappend a {*}{*}$m

Will error out on extra character.


回答1:


You've noticed that {*} (deliberately) doesn't go two steps deep.

Your particular example isn't very indicative of the problem, so I suggest this:

set a [list "ko" ]
set m [list [list "a b" "c d"] [list "e f" "g h"]]
lappend a {*}$m

Here, we get a set to ko {{a b} {c d}} {{e f} {g h}}. Which isn't what you wanted. But we can instead do this:

lappend a {*}[concat {*}$m]

Which gives this: ko {a b} {c d} {e f} {g h}. That looks right.


But are we really doing the right thing here? Let's poke inside with our super-secret introspector, the representation command:

% tcl::unsupported::representation $m
value is a list with a refcount of 4, object pointer at 0x10085ec50, internal representation 0x103016790:0x0, string representation "{{a b} {c d}}..."
% tcl::unsupported::representation [concat {*}$m]
value is a string with a refcount of 1, object pointer at 0x10085de10, internal representation 0x1030052d0:0x10085f190, string representation "{a b} {c d} {..."

Uh oh! We've lost the list-ness. It's not a catastrophe, but it isn't what we wanted. We instead should really do:

foreach sublist $m {
    lappend a {*}$sublist
}

Well, that's more code but preserves list-ness (which would be good if you happened to have precious types on the leaves; core Tcl doesn't have such precious types, but some extensions do).

We can compare the timings:

% time {
    set a [list "ko" ]
    set m [list [list "a b" "c d"] [list "e f" "g h"]]
    lappend a {*}[concat {*}$m]
} 10000
2.852789 microseconds per iteration
% time {
    set a [list "ko" ]
    set m [list [list "a b" "c d"] [list "e f" "g h"]]
    foreach sublist $m {
        lappend a {*}$sublist
    }
} 10000
4.022959 microseconds per iteration

Oh…

% time {apply {{} {
    set a [list "ko" ]
    set m [list [list "a b" "c d"] [list "e f" "g h"]]
    lappend a {*}[concat {*}$m]
}}} 10000
2.4486125 microseconds per iteration
% time {apply {{} {
    set a [list "ko" ]
    set m [list [list "a b" "c d"] [list "e f" "g h"]]
    foreach sublist $m {
        lappend a {*}$sublist
    }
}}} 10000
1.6870501 microseconds per iteration

Hah! The type-correct one is better in a procedure(-like context).




回答2:


The {*} syntax doesn’t really flatten a list per se. Flattening is an execution-level activity, while argument expansion is a parsing-level activity.

% set a a
% lappend a {*}{{a b} {c d}}

In this example, the items in the list {{a b} {c d}} are spliced into the command line as two separate arguments:

% lappend a {a b} {c d}
a {a b} {c d}

If you need to flatten one more level, you should do so with a command “between” the expansions:

% lappend a {*}[concat {*}{{a b} {c d}}]
a a b c d

Documentation: concat, lappend, {*} (syntax), Summary of Tcl language syntax



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43680723/two-level-splatter-tcl

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!