问题
In my Android app, I want to add a Bundle including a Place
object described below to my Intent. Since serializable was slow and not recommended, I preferred Parcelable.
Althoug I use Kotlin 1.3.31, I have problems parcelizing some data classes. Example:
import android.os.Parcelable
import kotlinx.android.parcel.Parcelize
@Parcelize
data class Place(val street: String, val postal: String, val city: String) : Parcelable
and Android Studio complains:
Class 'Place' is not abstract and does not implement abstract member public abstract fun writeToParcel(p0: Parcel!, p1: Int): Unit defined in android.os.Parcelable
According to some tutorials
That’s it! You don’t need to write any parcel methods anymore!
https://android.jlelse.eu/yet-another-awesome-kotlin-feature-parcelize-5439718ba220
and I do not want to use
androidExtensions {
experimental = true
}
in production stuff.
What alternatives would I have here?
回答1:
UPDATE 19/11/2019
After the stable release of Kotlin 1.3.60 and its corresponding Android Studio plugin the issue is no more. Let's celebrate
UPDATE 27/08/2019
After a bit of more researching and testing with the brand new Kotlin 1.3.50
seems that the issue is going to be finally fully addressed when they release Kotlin 1.3.60
as per this YouTrack issue
EDIT 19/06/2019
With Kotlin 1.3.40 release the @Parcelize
annotation is out of experimental and works quite nicely. The only issue is a reported issue that makes the IDE go red, leaving this to a side the code does compile and run perfectly.
I have also tested with this kind of objects and it does also work:
Old answer
I'm facing the exact same issue and while investigating I found this:
So the looks like the @Parcelize
annotation will be fully stable starting from Kotlin 1.3.40
. Until then you will have to set the experimental
flag. (Sadly)
They have wrongly pushed @Parcelize
outside experimental features and you still get that compilation error.
回答2:
You can always just implement Parcelable(cmd+enter/alt+enter on class name -> `Add Parcelable Implementation" in order for IDE to create method schemas for you) if you dont' want to/can't use experimental extensions.
I've, however, been using @Parcelize in prod environment(after a lot of testing though) for over a year, with no issues.(Just an opinion though, not saying you should)
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56018761/class-x-is-not-abstract-and-does-not-implement-fun-writetoparcel-defined-in-an