问题
I've created a dependency property like this:
public partial class MyControl: UserControl
{
//...
public static DependencyProperty XyzProperty = DependencyProperty.Register("Xyz",typeof (string),typeof (MyControl),new PropertyMetadata(default(string)));
public string Xyz
{
get { return (string) GetValue(XyzProperty ); }
set { SetValue(XyzProperty , value); }
}
//...
}
Then bind it to my wpf window and everything worked fine.
When I tried to add some logic to the setter I notice it wasn't being called. I modify the get;Set up to a point now they look like this:
get{return null;}
set{}
And it is still works! How come? What's the use of that GetValue/SetValue calls?
回答1:
The WPF data binding infrastructure uses the DependencyProperty directly, the Xyz property is a convenience interface for the programmer.
Take a look at the PropertyMetadata in the call to DependencyProperty.Register, you can supply a callback that will run when the property value is changed, this is where you can apply your business logic.
回答2:
The DependencyProperty is the backing store for the XyzProperty. If you access the property through the DependencyProperty interface, it completely bypasses the Property's Get/Set accessor.
Think of it this way:
private int _myValue = 0;
public int MyValue
{
get { return _myValue; }
set { _myValue = value; }
}
In this instance, if I manually assign _myValue = 12
, obviously the "Set" accessor for the MyValue property won't be called; I completely bypassed it! The same is true for DependencyProperties. WPF's binding system uses the DependencyProperty interfaces directly.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11906423/howcome-the-get-set-in-dependency-property-doesnt-do-anything