问题
Consider the following class:
class Foo
{
enum Flags {Bar, Baz, Bax};
template<Flags, class = void> struct Internal;
template<class unused> struct Internal<Bar, unused> {/* ... */};
template<class unused> struct Internal<Baz, unused> {/* ... */};
template<class unused> struct Internal<Bax, unused> {/* ... */};
};
The class outline above compiles and functions as expected when tested on VC++ 2010 and Comeau C++. However, when Foo
is made into a template itself, the above snippet breaks under VC++ 2010.
For example, the following snippet:
template<class> class Foo
{
// Same contents as the original non-templated Foo.
};
Yields the following error class:
C2754: 'Foo<<unnamed-symbol>>::Internal<Bar,unused>' : a partial specialization cannot have a dependent non-type template parameter
C2754: 'Foo<<unnamed-symbol>>::Internal<Baz,unused>' : a partial specialization cannot have a dependent non-type template parameter
C2754: 'Foo<<unnamed-symbol>>::Internal<Bax,unused>' : a partial specialization cannot have a dependent non-type template parameter
- Can someone explain what is going on here in plain English?
- How can I fix this (i.e., keep internal pseudo-explicit specializations in a templated
Foo
) on VC++ 2010?
回答1:
How can I fix this (i.e., keep internal pseudo-explicit specializations in a templated Foo) on VC++ 2010?
You can make the enumeration type non-dependent by declaring it in a non-template base class (C++03 made nested classes dependent in #108 but that doesn't include enumeration, but even if, such code would still be legal).
struct FooBase {
enum Flags {Bar, Baz, Bax};
};
template<class> class Foo : public FooBase {
template< ::FooBase::Flags, class = void > struct Internal;
// same other stuff ...
};
The "error class" link already gives a description of the intended cases where the error should be risen. The error thinks that all dependent types are forbidden, but in fact this is what the Standard says:
The type of a template parameter corresponding to a specialized non-type argument shall not be dependent on a parameter of the specialization.
So even if the name Flags
would be somehow dependent, that wouldn't make it ill-formed as long as it doesn't depend on a parameter of the specialization like in the example of your "error class" link.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3276596/dependent-non-type-template-parameters